Search for: "In re: Peer Review Action."
Results 81 - 100
of 919
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
Petition for review after the court of appeal affirmed the judgment in a civil action. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 4:33 pm
The piece is called Connectedness and its Discontents: The Difficulties of Federalism and Criminal Law, and it's coming out soon in a new issue of the peer-reviewed journal, the Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 7:37 am
In re D.J., 2018-Ohio-569 (2018) (9th Dist.) [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 1:30 am
In re Alex B.T. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 4:25 am
***Separately, on the concept of reviewing things -->Peer-to-patent reported: Peer-to-Patent attracted more than 2,000 peer reviewers. [read post]
4 May 2022, 1:00 pm
Bill, welcome to The Geek in Review. [read post]
30 Oct 2014, 1:00 am
CALLING ALL HILLBILLIES: RE-ELECT JIM SHARP AT YOUR PERIL Ever so often you get a member of the judiciary who does not give a rodent's posterior about the essential elements of a cause of action, established precedent, or the rules of civil and appellate procedure for that matter, and instead rules according to his whim; -- be it to play favorites or simply to show a disfavored litigant or attorney who is boss with the power of say-so. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 8:59 am
<> Bioenergy Technologies Office Peer Review Papers Available - BETO hosted the 2015 Project Peer Review from March 23–27, 2015 in Alexandria, VA -- More than 380 attendees participated in reviewing 190 of BETO's projects, representing more than $400 million in funding. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:48 pm
As we teach it at Cincinnati, the second semester Civ Pro course is an in-depth examination of some of the trickiest and most important provisions to be found in the Federal Rules: discovery, summary judgment, class actions, jury trials, appellate review, and res judicata, among other topics. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm
A peer-reviewed journal on infectious diseases, the CCDR is published on the Government of Canada website by the Public Health Agency of Canada. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:08 am
What a busy day it has been for those of us Kats who crouch intently at the Ministerial Mousehole, peering into the darkness in the hope of seeing some signs of activity other than (i) further requests for evidence-based submissions and (ii) more reviews of intellectual property. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:34 am
Only a reasonably large statistical sample would yield meaningful results, given that a disagreement between two peer reviewers is not as instructive as a decision by an appellate body (where the appellant will challenge particular errors as opposed to a second review taking place without the benefit of an appeal that raises particular issues). [read post]
3 Nov 2013, 8:05 pm
A peer-reviewed blog carnival, the host of each Blawg Review decides which of the submissions and recommended posts are suitable for inclusion in the presentation. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:57 am
Plaintiffs found corroboration in the criticisms of several peer reviewers. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 6:46 am
Recently, a blind peer reviewer for a law journal to which I’d submitted a manuscript included the following comment, among others, in rejecting my article for publication: “Since when is ‘because it’s the right thing to do’ a legal reason to do anything? [read post]
13 Sep 2007, 10:32 pm
In ex parte re-examination, the third party does NOT get to comment on Office Actions or patentee responses to Office Actions. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 10:34 pm
Our webinars extend the information contained in Peer Monitor Index along with Bruce's analysis to a forum where law firm managing partners and CEOs can derive practical, actionable strategies for dealing with ever-changing market conditions, including law firm hiring, compensation and mergers. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
Review and update policies that may result in biased actions. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 2:00 am
Review and update policies that may result in biased actions. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 2:01 pm
I therefore find that the actions of Marlene, on a balance of probabilities, crossed the line into the sphere of undue influence. [read post]
