Search for: "In re: Proportionality Review Project"
Results 81 - 100
of 116
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2015, 8:37 pm
Where the reviewing authority discovers a potential national security issues, it should refer the project over to the relevant body for national security review. [read post]
19 Feb 2022, 9:31 am
It is time – in fact it is overdue - to take stock of the increasingly imminent Online Safety Bill. [read post]
1 Sep 2022, 7:42 pm
And we’re going to start off the series by reviewing the new She Hulk Attorney at Law on Disney+. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
The discussion then turns to the methodology of an ongoing project involving legal content analysis of decisions by investment treaty tribunals. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 8:33 pm
Today they’re equal. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 9:17 pm
And if you cut them down, and you're just the man to do it, do you really think you could stand upright in the winds that would blow then? [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:32 pm
’[6] This hypothesis appears to be more a conclusion of popular psychology than from peer-reviewed studies. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:03 pm
Supreme Court has only applied the “exactions doctrine” in cases “involving a particular individual property, where government officials exercised their discretion to require something of the property owner in exchange for approval of a project. [read post]
13 Feb 2022, 8:03 am
Generally, that binary reflex is then evidenced by the response; and the response then revealing what a societal group believes is its essence--that is how the social elite signifies itself (or constructs and projects its meaning). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 2:13 am
The claimant, a project manager on a luxury hotel major construction project, brought a claim in libel, malicious falsehood and breach of data protection law. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 10:46 am
You might be, too: the “Neufeld” and “Scheck” are the co-founders of the Innocence Project. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am
So, blocking orders: fine so long as they're reasonable! [read post]
22 Sep 2024, 9:10 pm
The European Chamber has recently published its European Business in China Position Paper. [read post]
23 Dec 2022, 7:35 am
The argument for constructive unilateralism has re-emerged since, in 2019, the demise of the Appellate Body made it possible for WTO Members to prevent final adjudication of their measures through dispute settlement. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
The discussion then turns to the methodology of an ongoing project involving legal content analysis of decisions by investment treaty tribunals. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
In the process they, again, provide a much clearer window on their politics and the consequential premises that will drive their interpretive projects to some plausible place. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
Re. [read post]
24 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
The provisions were not salvageable under s. 1 of the Charter because they failed the minimal impairment/proportionality test. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Hacked Off has re-published lessons from the phone hacking scandal: 10 years on, first published on Campaign.org. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Supp. 2d 992, 1199–1200 (E.D.N.Y. 2006), rev’d on other grounds, 522 F.3d 215 (2d Cir. 2008) (describing confounding in studies of low-tar cigarettes, where authors failed to account for confounding and assessing healthier life styles in users) Third Circuit In re Zoloft Prods. [read post]
