Search for: "In re Amend. to R. Governing Admission to the Bar"
Results 81 - 100
of 153
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2017, 1:43 pm
Rather, we’re talking about speech outside such graded discussions, often outside class and sometimes even outside school. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 1:18 pm
Canby, Richard R. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 5:10 pm
Supreme Court of Florida.Rules of Juvenile Procedure -- Amendment -- Detention hearing -- Presence of counselIN RE: AMENDMENTS TO FLORIDA RULE OF JUVENILE PROCEDURE 8.010. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
Unless you're a tax lawyer or CPA, it can be very difficult to read much less comprehend the sometimes mind-numbingly complex provisions in an LLC operating agreement dealing with tax issues. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
Conway, No. 06-4083 "A sentence pursuant to a plea to possession of ammunition is affirmed over challenges to the district court's possession-of-a-shotgun enhancement arguing that: 1) he did not possess the shotgun; 2) the "relevant conduct" provisions of the sentencing guidelines do not apply to this conduct; 3) the sentencing guidelines preclude courts from enhancing sentences based on charged conduct where the government later dismisses the charge in connection with a… [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:00 am
That conclusion is equally applicable to the Crown’s appeals in the cases at bar. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 2:15 pm
R. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
(Canadian Trademark Blog) CIPO to open public consultation period regarding proposed changes to section 45 proceedings (Canadian Trademark Blog) Kraft and Euro-Excellence settle copyright case concerning parallel importation of chocolate bars (Excess Copyright) Toronto Star investigates textbook copying (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) CBC on public domain (Michael Geist) (Excess Copyright) Art Gallery of Ontario photography policy faces criticism over restriction based on misleading… [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:19 am
R.1249 (Patent Law Center) (IPBiz) (Inventive Step) (Inventive Step) (Patently-O) Please join the discussion by adding your comments on any of these stories, and please do let us know if you think we’ve missed something important, or if there is a source you think should be monitored. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:02 pm
§ 157(a), dated August 28, 1986, as amended by Order dated December 5, 2012, effective nunc pro tunc as of June 23, 2011. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] Lawsuit Against College for Part Refund of Fees for COVID-19 Shutdown May Go Forward
17 Mar 2021, 4:52 am
The court reached a different result in In re Boston University COVID-19 Refund Litigation, C.A. [read post]
14 May 2019, 8:15 am
The Phillips Court observed that a law that is neutral and of general applicability need not be justified by a compelling government interest even if it has the incidental effect of burdening a particular religious practice. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
Shaw Rose Nets (Patently-O) (Inventive Step) District Court S D California: In re TS Tech and In re Genentech do not apply where the requested venue is a neighbouring district: HP Hood LLC v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
According to the Minority Member's amended complaint (which includes a copy of the LLC agreement), in February 2009, the Majority Member barred him from the company's business office, threatened to have him "escorted out" if he tried to gain entry, and refused him access to the company's books and records. [read post]
27 May 2008, 9:50 am
R. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:08 pm
The relevant-irrelevant (R-I) technique ii. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:29 pm
R. 807, and the rest inadmissible under the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm
FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION, AGENCY FOR WORKFORCE INNOVATION and POINT BREAK SURVEYING, LLC, Appellees. 1st District.Attorney's fees -- Claim or defense not supported by material facts or applicable law -- Loan agreement -- In action on claim of personal loan that was poorly documented and never repaid by defendants who claim it was a gift, trial court abused discretion in awarding attorney's fees against plaintiff and her attorney based on defendant's claim that plaintiff… [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
With the introduction of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms in 1982, however, the courts were given a new tool to directly review the validity of admission requirements. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
Ramos-Cardenas, No. 06-51383 Defendants' convictions for possession of marijuana with intent to distribute and conspiracy to possess marijuana with intent to distribute are affirmed over claims of error regarding: 1) the sufficiency of the evidence; 2) whether some defendants' Sixth Amendment Confrontation Clause rights were violated by admission of the post-arrest statements given by two codefendants, even though a limiting instruction was given to the jury; and 3)… [read post]
