Search for: "In re Amendment to Rule 1.4"
Results 81 - 90
of 90
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm
T 241/02 has stated that “the grant of a patent does not necessarily constitute a final and automatic cut-off point excluding any reinsertion of deleted subject-matter” (point 1.4 of the reasons) and that T 1149/97 did not lay down a strict rule (point 2.3.5 of the reasons). [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 3:00 am
The defendants again opted to move for dismissal rather than answer the amended complaint, this time on the basis of documentary evidence establishing their defenses as a matter of law, as permitted by Section 3211(a)(1) of the Civil Practice Law and Rules. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 4:14 pm
During the "unreviewed" Q3 2009 10-Q conference call, an embittered Patrick Byrne expressed his utter contempt for Grant Thornton saying: I am dissing [is people on the scene] -- I mean, I think Grant Thornton -- we're not going to be exchanging Christmas cards. [read post]
29 Aug 2009, 7:14 am
In re Countrywide Corp. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:43 am
Court of Federal Claims has ruled. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 11:52 pm
(Techdirt) Germany German court rules that IP addresses are not personal information (Techdirt) Google Image search thumbnails 'infringement' under German ruling (Public Knowledge) Netherlands Dutch Court imposes real-world punishment for virtual theft (Ars Technica) United Kingdom IP and media regulation will be examined in digital review (Out-Law) United States Campus Computing Project Study reveals costs of P2P… [read post]
27 Jul 2008, 3:27 pm
Wood, one of the foundations of the Fourth Amendment, exemplary damages awarded against the Secretary of State, responsible for an unlawful search of John Wilkes's papers, were a spectacular £4,000. [read post]
4 May 2008, 11:08 am
Four courts have rejected this, stating that as the SCA does not refer to real-time data, and the Pen/Trap statute gives no right to information tracking a user's location, the only way to grant the government access to such information is under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 41(d)(1), which requires a showing of probable cause before a search warrant is issued.13The government has also argued that there is no Fourth Amendment implication in the communication between the… [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 10:38 am
Second, the proposed rule allows examiners to require applicants to make amendments to simplify the presentation of claims. [read post]
