Search for: "In re Application of Castle" Results 81 - 100 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2012, 11:15 am by Mandelman
In fact where I come from it’s reason to storm the damn castle. [read post]
24 Sep 2020, 3:48 am by SHG
We can explain the Castle Doctrine that makes it lawful for a resident to defend his home when someone breaks in at night. [read post]
15 Sep 2023, 10:32 am by Katelynn Minott, CPA & CEO
Unlike the Zivno Visa, the digital nomad visa is only open to applicants from one of eight countries and does not require you to be self-employed. [read post]
31 May 2007, 4:31 am
The Court was talking about antitrust, but every word is equally applicable to the mass torts we have to grapple with. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 12:00 pm by Geoffrey S. Corn
As a result—and excepting the most basic rights applicable to any detainee, such as the right to be treated humanely and the right to interact with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC)—they were not entitled to the POW treatment that, for example, the United States government would demand of any adversary for its own captured soldiers. [read post]
23 Jan 2011, 8:25 pm by Kelly
Alloy Wobbens; Major victory for Enercon India (Spicy IP) Israel 3D trademark application for tahini container rejected – but for all the wrong reasons (IP Factor) Japan New logo of the Japan Patent Office (Takaoka IP Japan Patent Attorney Library) Poland Industrial application of the device, Administrative Court of Voivodeship Warsaw (Wojewódzki S? [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 12:48 pm
  The re-adjustments in both respects will mark the trajectory of Cuban life for the next generation (compare here, with here). [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Sexual harassment is bad, in this world view, because it might lead someone to bring a lawsuit under Title VII or some other applicable anti-discrimination statute. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In fact, we're pretty confused about what the district court said and did. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:44 pm by Kelly
(Reexamination Alert) Recapture doctrine before the CAFC: In re Mostafazedeh (Patents Post-Grant) US Patents – Decisions District Court S D New York: Patentee’s ‘sufficiently plausible’ belief as to the scope of patents negates intent to deceive necessary for false marking claim: Max Impact v Sherwood Group (Docket Report) District Court E D Texas – Marshall jury verdict for plaintiff; invalidity rejected even under ‘preponderance’ standard: Alexsam… [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 3:43 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
The corporation maintains the right to be repaid all sums advanced, if the individual is ultimately shown not to be entitled to indemnification” (In re Adelphia Comms. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 4:55 am
This document indicates approval of the applicant for adoption (or foster care). [read post]