Search for: "In re Brown (1971)"
Results 81 - 100
of 124
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2012, 12:56 pm
They're colorful. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:08 am
Going back forty years, California’s ‘original sin,’ committed with the best of intention, was the 1971 Serrano decision that took the power over schools away from cities and bestowed it upon the state. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am
Priest (1971) 5 Cal.3d 584, 592 (Serrano I); Serrano v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm
SO, HERE’S THE BOTTOM-LINE… In 1954, Brown v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:23 am
In 1954, Brown v. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:24 pm
Bivens is the 1971 case that provides an implied cause of action for recovery of monetary damages against government officials who violate constitutional rights. [read post]
24 Jan 2012, 5:30 am
The gold and brown go together better than the mustard and brown of the San Diego Padres from the same era. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 2:00 am
See also Brown vs Calif. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 4:05 am
By 3 p.m., they’re tired, ready to finish the day, and not nearly as alert. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
In Say v Smith (1563) Plowd 269, 272, Anthony Brown J said that “every contract sufficient to make a lease for years ought to have certainty in three limitations, viz in the commencement of the term, in the continuance of it, and in the end of it … and words in a lease, which don’t make this appear, are but babble.”25. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am
In Say v Smith (1563) Plowd 269, 272, Anthony Brown J said that “every contract sufficient to make a lease for years ought to have certainty in three limitations, viz in the commencement of the term, in the continuance of it, and in the end of it … and words in a lease, which don’t make this appear, are but babble.”25. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
Thus the importance of re-opening communication is very high in other conflicts as well. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:06 am
See Brown v. [read post]
4 Aug 2011, 1:07 pm
1971). [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:04 am
” “No you’re not. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Superior Court, 920 P.2d 1347, 1354 (Cal. 1996); Brown v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
Brown v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am
By Steven G. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm
The majority view was that the detention was outside the scope of the powers granted by the 1971 Act. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 3:13 pm
Flowers, 58 N.J. 250, 260 (1971)). [read post]
