Search for: "In re Burwell" Results 81 - 100 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2014, 7:02 pm
If you want to know what the different cases are about, SCOTUSblog has you covered there too - with petition's they're watching. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 10:16 pm
  From the National Law Journal:Many of Burwell's clients who attended the breakfast are facing EEOC charges, some for the first time. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 5:16 am by Amy Howe
  We’re grateful for all of our readers (especially when you send us links for the round-up). [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 5:04 am by Amy Howe
At Re’s Judicata, Richard Re discusses a recent article by Erin Morrow Hawley in which Hawley suggests that, in its June decision in Burwell v. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 8:57 am by John Elwood
The Court also re-listed for a second time in Nichols v. [read post]
10 Mar 2015, 3:49 am by Amy Howe
Burwell, returning the Catholic university’s challenge to the Affordable Care Act’s birth-control mandate to the lower courts after last Term’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]
10 Sep 2015, 5:07 am
Burwell presents a novel and largely unprecedented standing claim, arguably based upon novel and somewhat unprecedented assertions of executive authority in domestic policy. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:11 am by Clay Hodges
These companies have First Amendment commercial free speech rights (though they’re not as broad as the free speech rights individuals have) and there’s a tension between what the FDA wants companies to say, what these companies want to say, and what the courts say the companies can say. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:11 am by Clay Hodges
These companies have First Amendment commercial free speech rights (though they’re not as broad as the free speech rights individuals have) and there’s a tension between what the FDA wants companies to say, what these companies want to say, and what the courts say the companies can say. [read post]
9 Jan 2015, 1:05 pm by Sandy Levinson
There is an illuminating piece by Stephen Stromberg in today's Washington Post on the utter disaster that will ensue if those supporting the challenge in Burwell prevail before the Supreme Court re the "state" as distinguished from "federal" exhanges. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 9:07 am by Marty Lederman
It's been almost a year since my last series of posts on the fallout from Hobby Lobby--in particular, on the challenges by nonprofit organizations to the government's augmented religious accommodation. [read post]