Search for: "In re Clarence B." Results 81 - 100 of 169
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2017, 12:07 pm by Nora Demleitner
United States, the Court declared the identically worded residual clause in the Armed Career Criminal Act of 1984, Section 924(e)(2)(B), unconstitutionally vague. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 12:35 pm by Kevin Russell and Charles Davis
Louisiana, over the dissents of Justices Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito, and Clarence Thomas. [read post]
20 Jun 2016, 6:19 pm by Rory Little
” Justice Clarence Thomas dissented alone, largely reprising his 2005 dissent in Gonzales v. [read post]
10 Jun 2016, 8:28 am by Rory Little
In dissent, Justice Clarence Thomas, joined by Justice Kennedy, argued that old common law cases did not recognize such discretion once a jury was formally discharged; on balance, he concluded, the Court should adhere to that easily administered rule. [read post]
24 May 2016, 3:57 am by SHG
The reason is that it tells prosecutors to stop putting a “capital B” next to the names of the jurors they plan to strike, so as not to make a hard record of their racism, and then they’re home free. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
Or sixths, if we’re talking about Friedman v. [read post]
4 Nov 2015, 6:18 am by Evan Lee
” Among the remaining Justices, neither Ruth Bader Ginsburg nor Clarence Thomas said anything obviously tipping their hands. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 4:21 am by SHG
But does that potential juror have a picture of Clarence Thomas over his bed? [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 8:35 am by Rory Little
Last June, the Supreme Court’s Term ended not with the same-sex marriage opinions (announced three days earlier), but rather with Justice Stephen Breyer’s surprising and comprehensive opinion (joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg) in Glossip v. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 10:17 pm by Jeff Gamso
 As they said to Clarence Brandley down in Texas, "Since you're the nigger, you're elected. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:43 pm by Jeff Gamso
 And therein . . . .Well, like I said, you can sort of see where this is going to go.Consider the Clarence Thomas chapter. [read post]