Search for: "In re Eadie"
Results 81 - 100
of 137
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2014, 5:05 pm
It will be re-fixed for a later date. [read post]
8 May 2012, 5:07 pm
Yet the reliability of this analysis is questionable because Eady J appears to have brought the balancing of article 8 and 10 ECHR into the initial question of whether there is a reasonable expectation of privacy. [read post]
23 Feb 2014, 4:03 pm
On 21 February 2014 there was an application in the case of Jerrard v Blyth before Sir David Eady. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:13 pm
The rule however may not survive much longer as its pre-determined outcome does not reflect the balancing of the competing values and Articles – under the Human Rights Act and the European Convention, as noted by Eady J. in his recent speech at the City University and see Sunderland Housing Company v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 8:33 am
In the case of those postings, the Claimants' entitlement to take action to protect their right to reputation outweighs, in my judgment, the right of the authors to maintain their anonymity and their right to express themselves freely, Thuis was of course however an action for discloure of the identity of the commenters by Norwhich Pharmacal orders , not an actual action on liability.But see also Smith v ADFN , misreported as Adven in Edwards and Waelde 3rd ed, oh dear.Here Eady J… [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 4:55 pm
The Court of Appeal upheld the trial decision of Eady J and the House of Lords refused permission to appeal. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 4:09 pm
This is a principle that has been stated and re-stated by the Supreme Court of Canada. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 9:59 am
Last Friday, a statement in open court was read out in front of Mr Justice Eady in court 13 of the Royal Courts of Justice. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:28 am
D (A Child) [2011] EWCA Civ 684 (14 June 2011): Mother who changed her story re father’s role in child abuse fact-finding hearing forced to disclose notes of lawyers’ advice. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 3:00 am
” [36] This is what has become known as the “Canute principle” (see [34] and Re Stedman [2009] EWHC 935 (Fam), [74-93]). [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 2:43 am
The tabloid press were not persuaded: the Daily Express’ headline was “Now asylum if you’re gay” while the Daily Mail had the headline “Supreme Court Judge says homosexual asylum seekers should be allowed to stay because ‘gays must be free to enjoy Kylie concerts and cocktails‘. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:08 pm
” The judge relied heavily on the decision of the Supreme Court in the case of In re Guardian News and Media Ltd [2010] 2 WLR 325; [2010] UKSC 1. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 4:47 pm
Fortunately, media law cases have not fallen apart with the respective retirements of Sir Michael Tugendhat and Sir David Eady, and recent specialists to join the High Court include Mr Justice Warby in 2014, and Mr Justice Nicklin in 2017 – both formerly of 5RB chambers. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 9:37 am
As held by Mr Justice Eady on July 19 2009. [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 5:18 pm
In our contribution to the continuing debate on this issue we are re-posting an updated version of this series of posts from last year on the way ahead for privacy law. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 4:05 pm
It has been re-affirmed in the Court of Appeal in modern times in Holley v Smyth [1998] 1 All ER 852 and post the Human Rights Act in Greene v Associated Newspapers [2005] 2 WLR 281. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am
” The Court of Appeal agreed with the judge that the last passage from Reynolds had to be revised: [2010] EMLR 26 at [21]:- “..although the point was not mentioned in Jameel [2007] 1 AC 359, I agree with the Judge (at … paragraph 146) that the last sentence in the passage quoted above .. from Lord Nicholls’s opinion cannot stand following the 1998 Act: it is clear from In re S .. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
In the Courts On Monday 12 March 2012, Eady J concluded the hearing of the second application to re-amend the defence in the case of Hunt v Times Newspapers. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:10 am
The judgments at first instance and on appeal were mainly taken up with the facts (the defence of justification) and, in particular, an analysis of the enforceability of a contractual re-engagement clause, in the light of the 2003 Employment Agencies & Employment Business Regulations SI 2003/3319. [read post]
30 May 2009, 3:07 am
Helen Eadie claimed the most, at £170.42, to cover wreaths for different villages in her Dunfermline East constituency. [read post]
