Search for: "In re Ford Motor Co." Results 81 - 100 of 344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
The segments reprinted here, with slight modifications to make them better suited to this format, were written by Carlton Fields shareholders Gary Sasso and Matt Allen, and David Leitch, general counsel of Ford Motor Company. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:58 am
The segments reprinted here, with slight modifications to make them better suited to this format, were written by Carlton Fields shareholders Gary Sasso and Matt Allen, and David Leitch, general counsel of Ford Motor Company. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 4:09 pm by chucknewton
Tex. 2006), ruled that an undersecured creditor, in this case Ford Motor Credit Co., was entitled not only to adequate protection payments, but “super-priority” status of the inadequate adequate protection provided during the case meant that the Chapter 13 plan had to pay those amounts before paying any of the debtor’s attorneys fee pursuant to 11 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
We're talking about the Restatement (Third) of Torts, Products Liability §2, to be precise. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 8:40 am by WIMS
<> EPA Requires Ford to Correct Fuel Economy for Six Vehicle Models - EPA announced that Ford Motor Company is revising the fuel economy (mpg) estimates for six vehicle models to correct errors found in an internal Ford audit. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 4:42 am by Jon Hyman
Ford Motor Co., the 6th Circuit, for the first time, recognized that modern technology is making telecommuting a realistic reasonable accommodation option. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:00 pm by Robert Laplaca
General Electric, Ford Motor Company, U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 12:59 pm
Ford Motor Co&nbsp; &nbsp; Western District of Kentucky at LouisvilleWILLIAM W SCHWARZER, District Judge. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 9:01 pm by Don Cruse
A key question is whether the courts below were applying the correct definition of “producing cause,” in light of the Court’s decision in 2007 in Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:19 pm by andré douglas pond cummings
  They are to consider Ford’s decision to lower prices against the required goal of the Ford Motor Co. to work diligently to increase profits for its shareholders (in this case the Dodge Bros. were significant shareholders in Ford Motor Co.). [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 8:13 pm
A search for Ford should yield Ford Motor Co., as the correct first answer, Wales said. [read post]