Search for: "In re Harm R. (1979)"
Results 81 - 100
of 113
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Dec 2008, 6:10 pm
Taylor noted that "e preclusive effect of a judgment is defined by claim preclusion and issue preclusion, which are collectively referred to as 'res judicata.'" 128 S. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:48 pm
A dramatic example is provided by the Three Mile Island accident in 1979. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm
Bush’s Acting Legal Adviser) and David R. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 4:00 am
In the 1975 Ontario judgment Re Brown, (1975), 9 O.R. (2d) 185 at 192 (Ont. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
The existing bias against productivity-enhancing investments produces distortions for firms within and across sectors, ultimately harming the kinds of industries industrial policy proponents want to support. [read post]
27 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
Decisions of interest involving Government and Administrative Law Source: Justia August 26, 2011 Dickow v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:24 am
Children can’t give such consent, especially when they’re infants but also even when they’re older, since the consent must be sufficiently mature. [read post]
8 Feb 2020, 9:58 am
The trial court enforced the provision, ruling that it was not a penalty because it reasonably estimated the harm that would result from a breach, and actual damages were difficult to predict when the contract was made.1 On those grounds, the court of appeals affirmed.. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 10:32 am
The Hague Convention was adopted to protect children internationally from the harmful effects of their wrongful removal or retention and to establish procedures to ensure their prompt return to the nation-state of their habitual residence, as well as to secure protection for rights of access. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 1:07 pm
Finding it would serve no public purpose, the master recommended that none be re-tried.[13] That meant 4,500 cases of children appearing in that court from 2003 to 2008.[14] On October 29, 2009, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court agreed. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
In re Conservatorship of Turner, No. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
We took a look at a case called Birdsong v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 4:22 am
Kirk Baert has kindly permitted us to post his Application to the Supreme Court of Canada for leave to appeal the Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 4:42 pm
” Private figures can get proven compensatory damages (including emotional distress damages stemming from harm to reputation) based on a showing of mere negligence on the defendant’s part, though they still need to show actual malice to get presumed damages or punitive damages. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 1:52 am
If the decision is quashed, the decision maker may be free to re-consider it and as long as the error of law is not repeated and no other error committed, may reach the same decision. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm
From 1979-2009, total license fees paid by cable & satellite companies to support C-SPAN totaled $922 million. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
This amendment to the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2005: A Legacy for Users ("SAFETEA") provides in relevant part that: [a]n owner of a motor vehicle that rents or leases the vehicle to a person (or an affiliate of the owner) shall not be liable under the law of any State or political subdivision thereof, by reason of being the owner of the vehicle (or an affiliate of the owner), for harm to persons or property that… [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 1:37 pm
., 179 P.3d 905, 914 (Cal. 2008) (“[r]equiring manufacturers to warn their products’ users in all instances would place an onerous burden on them and would invite mass consumer disregard and ultimate contempt for the warning process”); Thompson v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
[A forthcoming article of mine in the New York University Journal of Law & Liberty.] [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 10:34 am
Simply allowing speech to be punished because it intentionally encourages some crime in the abstract, without a showing of imminence or likelihood of harm, would wrongly let Williams swallow up Brandenburg. [read post]
