Search for: "In re Interest of Justin V." Results 81 - 100 of 230
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Sep 2018, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has covered the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2018] EWCA Civ 1780. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
This re-occurred in the nine anonymous emails 14 times; he often used a hyphen incorrectly. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 5:15 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
That’s interesting, but does this new thing prevent piracy? [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 5:19 am by Charles Sartain
Once they catch up to it (and they will unless you’re Justin Verlander which, face it, you are not), goodbye game. [read post]
9 May 2018, 8:39 am by INFORRM
“ Mr Millar added: “The relevant editorial staff believed, prior to broadcasts commencing, that publication would be in the public interest. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 8:20 am
A day in the life of a Kat:from Playboy bunny to ...In late 2017 The IPKat reported that, after Europe, it appeared that the interplay between linking and copyright protection had re-surfaced also in the US [use of the term 're-surfaced' is justified in light of the fact that US courts have already had the chance to address these issues, eg in the well-known Perfect 10 case].After a few months, earlier this week two decisions have been issued on this matter ... with two… [read post]
12 Feb 2018, 7:59 am by William Ford
Justin Amash and Patrick Eddington. [read post]
11 Jun 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Mark Pearson has published his submission to the Select Committee on the Future of Public Interest Journalism on Journlaw. [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
And the Court so held in an older case, Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:41 pm by Giles Peaker
Full disclosure, I acted for the intervener in this second appeal, the Residential Landlords Association, with Justin Bates (or as it turns out, Bate) as counsel. [read post]