Search for: "In re J. J."
Results 81 - 100
of 17,336
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2019, 3:21 pm
Remember that you may re-apply and cure any defects in your application in the future. [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 12:13 pm
The post Nile Theater’s grand re-opening happening Thursday appeared first on J&Y Law Firm. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:20 pm
When you’re here, be sure to take the time to browse. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm
As can be seen from the basic proposition for a revision of the EPC of October 13, 2000 (MR/2/00, Number 6, A 122), the lawmaker wanted to keep the possibility of re-establishment into the time limit for further processing, which had been acknowledged by the case law (J 12/92 [3.2.2]; J 29/94 [3], J 902/87 [2.2-4]). [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 9:03 am
So you think you qualify for the J1 exceptional hardship waiver or you’re interested in knowing more about it, but how do you qualify? [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 12:44 pm
Also click here and here for our J waiver success stories. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 8:43 am
” In this eight-part interview, Judge J. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 7:43 am
In this eight-part interview, Judge J. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 11:37 am
Also under study is merging the j-school with other disciplines to open a broader "school of information. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
”); Beau J. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
Thanks to Pamela J. [read post]
29 Aug 2016, 9:00 am
In this segment Attorney Jacob J. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:00 am
This included F-2, J-2, or M-2 dependents. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 6:30 am
Last year the High Court of England and Wales (Arnold J) in FAPL v BT [2017] EWHC 480 Ch concluded that it had jurisdiction under section 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act to order to block access to streaming services (rather than the more tradition case of websites) giving unauthorised access to protected content. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 1:14 am
In den Niederlanden beginnt ein spektakuläres Mordverfahren. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:07 am
This opinion will not be published. 2009AP2564 In re the marriage of: Ar-Rahmaan v. [read post]
26 Apr 2011, 11:11 am
Read part one of our post on Ethan J. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 12:30 am
US representatives) may be held responsible for taking the necessary care (J 4/07).The appeal in J 05/18 related to a decision by the Examining Division to re-establish an application (EP12152933.3) following a failure to meet a further processing deadline (Article 121 EPC). [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
In proceedings before the EPO, re-establishment of rights under Article 122 EPC is ruled out in respect of the period under Rule 49ter.2(b)(i) PCT for filing a request for restoration of a right of priority. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 3:22 am
In proceedings before the EPO, re-establishment of rights under Article 122 EPC is ruled out in respect of the period under Rule 49ter.2(b)(i) PCT for filing a request for restoration of a right of priority. [read post]
