Search for: "In re J.J.,J.J.,J.J."
Results 81 - 100
of 104
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2010, 9:21 am
After we really die, if we find ourselves somewhere and we're talking about the distinctions between "purgatory" and "heaven," and "the afterlife" and "being dead," and somebody says "Deja vu! [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 9:37 am
Re feedback on student writing, there's no question we need to improve. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 9:18 am
(Hey, You’re on it!) [read post]
23 Jan 2010, 8:20 pm
After all, if Martin Andelman from Mandelman Matters calls, and you’re a scammer, chances are you don’t take the call. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:37 am
That depends, J.J. [read post]
24 Nov 2009, 10:08 am
He gets dinged by the BBO, for making a misleading statement on his website, re: his expertise in immigration law; read: he was holding out as an immigration law specialist when he was not; read: Admonition 09-12.As with any BBO admonitions, suspensions, disbarments, it is about reading the tea leaves, for still-practicing, unscathed attorneys. [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 2:44 am
See In re Yeley, 85 USPQ2d 1150 (TTAB 2007) [J.J. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 3:01 am
Here're the panels:Labor Trafficking:IntLawGrrl Dina Francesca Haynes, New England School of Law; James Gray Pope, Rutgers-Newark; Dr. [read post]
3 Oct 2009, 4:40 pm
Savage (In re Greene) (9th Cir. [read post]
19 Aug 2009, 3:50 am
” This wasn’t the first time that dueling panels of the 8th had come to opposite conclusions; in In re J.J., the Supreme Court dealt with a question involving assignment of cases to visiting judges, and two different panels of the 8th had come out with conflicting decisions on the issue on the same day. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:00 pm
“J.J. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 3:30 am
Take a look at the Supreme Court’s decision in In re J.J. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 10:11 pm
I now have a job that I love more than J.J. loved Big Macs. [read post]
24 Nov 2008, 7:14 pm
BAKER, CHIEF JUDGE ROBB, BARNES, CRONE, J.J., CONCUR. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 10:09 pm
Finally, J.J. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 5:01 pm
" Paternity of J.J.; I.Y. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Callahan's Stay Motion is in Re: Richard Allenv. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 4:27 am
Are rumors of the demise of the Ninth Circuit's Armendariz doctrine greatly exaggerated, or is J.J. [read post]
24 Oct 2007, 4:47 am
In re I. [read post]
18 Oct 2007, 11:44 pm
As long as we're reading the gossip column this morning, let's keep going:Talk about random: Jimmie (J.J.) [read post]
