Search for: "In re Marriage of Olson"
Results 81 - 98
of 98
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2010, 11:03 am
Peter Olson: Tough question. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 2:05 pm
They’re harsh words that, of course, beg for some sort of response. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:49 am
"Representing them are two high-powered attorneys, Ted Olson and David Boies. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:33 pm
High-powered lawyers Ted Olson and David Boies aren't just litigating same-sex marriage rights in a California federal court room, they're also complementing their litigation strategy with a media campaign to educate ordinary Americans and influence public opinion. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 12:01 am
If you’re either part of the solution or part of the problem, you Justice Scalia, may be part of the problem. [read post]
7 Aug 2009, 5:50 am
As readers of this blog very likely know, ADF represented Proposition 22 Legal Defense & Education Fund in In re Marriage Cases, 43 Cal.4th 757 (2008). [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 10:27 am
I hope some people will open their eyes to the decency of getting to the point where we allow gay and lesbian individuals to be married and have a happy life.Olson also dismissed the concern that his involvement represents a "trojan horse" to advocates of same-sex marriage, claiming that "we're having support from the ACLU and from national lesbian groups. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 6:37 am
“We’re prepared, willing and able to move as fast as the judge is willing to go. [read post]
1 Jun 2009, 12:11 am
Indeed, I would add that there's a further risk: If the Supreme Court were to invalidate the ban, that could inspire a backlash that would re-energize the currently moribund religious right, and possibly even lead to a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. [read post]
28 May 2009, 2:50 pm
If it doesn't, and if the lawsuit crashes and burns and sets back litigation efforts for years if not decades, I'll look foward to seeing Ted Olson lobby just as publicly for a pro-same-sex marriage plank in the 2012 Republican platorm. [read post]
28 May 2009, 7:07 am
One more issue then we're done: why not also sue Schwarzenegger and the rest personally to obtain money damages? [read post]
28 May 2009, 6:48 am
I have no clue what Olson's (and Boies's) reasons are -- maybe they're sincere, or maybe, as suggested by a commentor to Ethan's post, they're cynical. [read post]
27 May 2009, 8:11 pm
By now we all know that the California Supreme Court has ruled that Proposition 8 is constitutional, but that existing same-sex marriages shall stand. [read post]
27 May 2009, 11:24 am
Getting a conservative heavyweight like Olson to weigh in on gay marriage has left gay rights activists almost speechless. [read post]
27 May 2009, 11:12 am
Okay, so we got our hands on the complaint filed by litigating heavyweights David Boies, Ted Olson and Ted Boutros against the powers-that-be out in California over Proposition 8. [read post]
27 May 2009, 12:58 am
Gore, announced they're teaming up to mount a federal challenge to Prop 8. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 9:01 pm
" Concerned that this position might be seen as contradicting his prior statements that he considered the same-sex marriages already performed to remain valid, Brown added a footnote stating that nothing in his response "should be construed to suggest that the Attorney General questions the validity of any same-sex marriage that occurred after the effective date of this Court's decision in In re Marriage Cases, but before November 5, 2008. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 3:13 pm
Marvelling at the landmark Williamsburg Bank tower that had come into view, Brooklyn's tallest building with a magnificent clock tower, he turned our gathering group to a favorite subject: The marriage of business and law. [read post]
