Search for: "In re Michael B"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2023, 12:04 pm
Others, like former Republican Party Chair Michael Steele, will hang out with liberals but explicitly and insistently reject the idea of becoming Democrats, presumably for substantive policy reasons -- although it could simply be a matter of a disgusted fan of, say, Ohio State abandoning the team but continuing to hate Michigan.But because the Republican coalition has become even more mismatched than the notoriously unstable collection of groups that have uncomfortably coexisted in… [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 3:25 am
So we’re really really excited to have the cofounders of Paxton.ai Tanguy Chau, CEO and CTO Michael Ulin. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 3:00 am
See § 626.854(10)(b), Fla. [read post]
7 Sep 2023, 7:32 am
See Sonja B. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:18 am
In an ABA practice advisory , “Future Proofing: A Present Look at ChatGPT in Your Future” by Dan Pinnington and Reid Trautz, the authors provide the example of how an immigration lawyer has been testing ChatGPT for his busy practice: Miami immigration lawyer Michael Harris has been testing ChatGPT for his busy practice by seeing how it could write analytical essays or letters typically used in his practice. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 3:52 pm
Today, we are on the eve of the HCCH 2019 Judgments Convention’s entry into force. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 11:10 pm
Michael le Belfrey York [2023] ECC Yor 2] [Video] [Top of section] [Top of post] Reordering and alternative uses Re St. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:22 pm
In re Zantac (Ranitidine) Prods. [read post]
23 Aug 2023, 2:20 am
Application of guidance In Re All Saints West Burnley, Bullimore Ch. observed: [48]. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 5:01 am
B. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 5:07 am
When News Media Canada says “what we’re saying to Meta is, ‛The regulations aren’t drafted yet. [read post]
17 Aug 2023, 2:57 am
Jeremy B. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:50 am
Michael Wandsworth Common [2023] ECC Swk 2; Re St. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 5:36 am
If you’re having trouble understanding the difference, Josh Chafetz has the best articulation of the “strong” version of the MQD: “If a majority of justices determine that eating an ice cream cone is a major question, then it is not enough that Congress has empowered the agency to ‘eat any dessert it chooses. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 11:02 am
Alberto B. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 10:55 am
Important Note to Amended USSG §5C1.1 Defense practitioners should be aware that the USSC references this new Guideline in its amended USSG §5C1.1, where its application note 4 provides that a sentence other than imprisonment is generally appropriate if (1) a person is in Zone A or B of the Sentencing Table and (2) eligible for the new USSG § 4C1.1 reduction. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 6:30 am
Res. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 3:11 am
In re Exhart Environmental Systems, Inc., Serial No. 90006864 (August 8, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 pm
Some have called him Jermichael Phelps or Michael B. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 8:20 am
SPL Group, Inc., Opposition No. 91263984 (August 2, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Michael B. [read post]
