Search for: "In re Millette" Results 81 - 100 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Oct 2014, 6:35 am by Martha Engel
  I’m sure local architectural historian Larry Millett or my uncle Tommy would have something to add. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:16 am by Robin Shea
And do you know how hard it is to take a business call while you’re wearing a Tor Johnson mask?) [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 6:51 pm by Haley Proctor
Judge Walker (joined by Judges Millett and Wilkins) affirmed. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 9:17 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge Millett wrote separately, concurring in the judgment in part and dissenting in part. [read post]
21 May 2018, 7:18 am by Steve Vladeck
Circuit panel (consisting of Judges Millett, Pillard, and Wilkins) granted an administrative stay for purposes of resolving both the intervention question and their jurisdiction to do so. [read post]
17 May 2019, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Circuit Judge Millett, objecting to the practice of increasing defendants' criminal sentences on the basis of charges that a jury acquitted on. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:41 pm by Tony Mauro
Speaking at his Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing, GOP senators challenged Verrilli (pictured at left) to say whether he agreed with the administration's decision, and whether, as the administration's top lawyer before the Court, he would re-examine it. [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 10:27 am by Ciaran Gill, Olswang LLP
Practically speaking, the facts of the case re-affirm the importance of ensuring that charges are correctly executed. [read post]
24 Jul 2022, 12:23 pm by Hyland Hunt
Circuit decided three other cases this week—re FERC, FOIA, and foreign export controls/ultra vires review. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm by Aaron L. Nielson
Judge Edwards — joined by Judges Millett and Tatel — addressed 49 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 9:16 pm by Tyler Hoguet
In writing the opinion for the court, Judge Patricia Millett concluded that, even though the law could be read more broadly, a limited reading is necessary to avoid “grave constitutional concerns. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:23 am by Eugene Volokh
From Thursday's Virginia Supreme Court decision in In re Bennett (a per curiam endorsed by Chief Justice Bernard Goodwyn, Justices Cleo Powell and Stephen McCullough, and Senior Justice LeRoy Millette): On May 20, 2021, Judge Adrianne L. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 1:27 pm by Bexis
  Id. at *2.The court let plaintiff get away with this bait-and-switch, and let him proceed – and ultimately recover to the tune of $18 million – on the Illinois equivalent of the “malfunction theory”/res ipsa loquitur, despite no longer having the product. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
 In Corbyn v Millett [2021] EWCA Civ 657, the Court of Appeal provided useful commentary on the issue of ‘bare comment’. [read post]