Search for: "In re Pohl"
Results 81 - 100
of 226
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2015, 7:34 am
She was re-elected for a second term in 2014. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 7:34 am
She was re-elected for a second term in 2014. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 5:29 am
Pohl et al.), and we’re in the process of digitizing our remaining holdings. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 12:00 pm
” The judge also said that Chief Judge Pohl’s “opinion in that case has no reflection on what we’re going to do in this case,” pointing out that Chief Judge Pohl issued his ruling on the briefs, while this commission is holding an evidentiary hearing. [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 12:16 pm
But what we’re doing right now is not changing the results on the ground. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 1:24 pm
If the privilege does apply, it may be pierced based on factors listed in a case cited by the government—In re Sealed Case. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 6:10 am
UPDATE: We’re back. [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 11:21 am
Judge James Pohl did not rule on the matter. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 9:43 am
So why does the government oppose Judge Pohl’s severance order? [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 11:35 am
But its not just any discovery we’re talking about, as Capt. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 11:28 am
Al-Nashiri’s lawyers immediately cried foul, and asked to re-open ripe, undecided motions that Judge Pohl took with him, notwithstanding his replacement by Judge Vance. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:27 pm
The Special Review Team relies heavily on the rules governing the latter, but we’re concerned here with the former. [read post]
28 May 2014, 9:30 am
Kammen protests: we’re not seeking to displace the habeas court’s authority. [read post]
28 May 2014, 9:18 am
In any case, we’re jumping the gun, Lockhart argues. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 7:37 am
The latter ought to be called to testify, too, given the circumstances surrounding Judge Pohl’s re-appointment—and a letter MacDonald apparently wrote, which spoke approvingly of Judge Pohl. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 7:14 am
We’re back in session. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 8:18 am
Judge Pohl has a duty to do this, she says, and can do this by means of an ex parte hearing. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 1:33 pm
This last bit is apparently illuminating for Judge Pohl. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:19 am
No, this issue isn’t ripe, as we’re a good ways off from trial, and even a longer way off from any sentencing. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 9:04 am
Here, we’re concerned chiefly with the latter. [read post]
