Search for: "In re R.C."
Results 81 - 100
of 300
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2017, 11:33 am
Not an affidavit from the physician, so we’re doing this,” and the trial went forward. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 7:46 am
In re: R.K. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 6:45 am
”) R.C. 2505.02(B)(2) (A final order is one that affects a substantial right made in a special proceeding or upon a summary application in an action after judgment.) [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 6:40 am
That means any tie votes would uphold the appellate decision below, or such a case could be re-argued. [read post]
21 Oct 2017, 6:52 am
A-4867-15T3 2017 WL 4530879 (Decided October 11, 2017).Capehart & Scatchard, PA - Appellant (Employer)R.C. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 7:08 am
”) R.C. 2152.01 (Stating the purpose of juvenile dispositions, which the legislature amended to include “protect[ing] the public interest and safety. [read post]
28 Sep 2017, 6:11 am
’s absence constituted an implicit waiver of the right to counsel under R.C. 2151.352 and Juv.R. 4(A). [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 7:19 am
On September 13, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case, In re: R.K. [read post]
19 Aug 2017, 12:00 am
Of course, if you’re happily married, you hope and pray that you’ll never be in the place of having to cash one in. [read post]
20 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
” Justice French On July 18, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in In re Adoption of P.L.H., Slip Opinion No. 2017-Ohio-5824. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 1:27 pm
At the Supreme Court There are two issues in this appeal-one involves the disparity in sentencing between co-defendants, the other challenging the constitutionality of the mandatory sentencing statutes in R.C. 2929 as applied to juveniles. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 6:42 am
”) In re K.M., 2012-Ohio-6266(5th Dist.) [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am
The state moved to transfer Aalim to adult court pursuant to R.C. 2152.10(A)(2)(b) and 2152.12 (A)(1)(b). [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 4:52 am
The 8th District, however, found res judicata to be inapplicable, because of the Ohio Supreme Court reversal on this point. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 8:29 am
According to the Supreme Court’s own rules of practice, it is not to be a re-argument of the case. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 6:58 am
”) In re D.R.B., 2015-Ohio-3346 (8th Dist.) [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 6:23 am
”) In re D.R.B., 2015-Ohio-3346 (8th Dist.) [read post]
7 Jan 2017, 8:26 am
”) In re Gault, 387 U.S. 1 (1967) (“[N]either the Fourteenth Amendment nor the Bill of Rights is for adults alone. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:08 am
”) R.C. 2929.20 Sentence reduction through judicial release. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 8:04 am
These blog cases are still out: In re: (C.C.S.), (C.L.S.) v. [read post]
