Search for: "In re Rosel" Results 81 - 100 of 164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Aug 2010, 10:52 am by PaulKostro
In this case, although defendant’s lay-off resulted through no fault of his own, and his overall plan for re-education leading to a new career may be laudable, these facts do not resolve whether his current income from a new, less financially lucrative career should be used for the purpose of modifying child support. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 8:43 am by PaulKostro
Although the Supreme Court has affirmed that Rule 4:50-1 is the appropriate vehicle when seeking to vacate a judgment terminating parental rights, In re Guardianship of J.N.H., 172 N.J. 440, 474 (2002), the Court specifically noted that when vacating a judgment of guardianship “the future of a child is at stake. [read post]
17 May 2011, 10:12 am by PaulKostro
In re M.R., supra, 135 N.J. at 166; In re Conroy, 98 N.J. 321, 345 (1985). [read post]
31 Aug 2013, 11:38 am by Andres
  The previous Dataco case concerning copyright protection of databases, had been decided by the Court of Justice  in the same year, however in this instance  the solution focused essentially  on the Court’s jurisdiction  in  the online environment which pivoted on the question of where the claimed extraction or re-utilization was deemed to occur. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 10:37 am by PaulKostro
(quoting In re Rittenhouse’s Will, 19 N.J. 376, 378-79 (1995)). [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 2:08 pm by PaulKostro
Accordingly, the court should not re-write a contract or grant a better deal than that for which the parties expressly bargained. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 10:29 am by PaulKostro
As such, the court should not re-write a contract or grant a better deal than that for which the parties expressly bargained. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 5:11 am
” In re Opinion No. 653 of the Advisory Comm. on Prof’l Ethics, 132 N.J. 124, 129 (1993). [read post]