Search for: "In re Royall" Results 81 - 100 of 2,439
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2023, 7:11 am by hpoppe
American colonists regularly challenged the laws and actions of the British King, royally-appointed colonial officials, and Parliament. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 1:37 pm by Berniard Law Firm
Imagine you’re in a nail-biting poker game, where every decision could tip the balance between winning and losing. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 5:26 am by centerforartlaw
In March 2002, the Benin Royal Palace and the Federal Ministry of Information and Culture from Nigeria formally requested that “all the cultural property belonging to the Oba of Benin illegally taken away by the British in 1897 should be returned to the rightful owner, the Oba of Benin. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 12:00 am by Hayleigh Bosher
Mezei then takes us through the various re-trials and his analysis of the decisions, highlighting the limitations of their strategy as “tremendous negative externalities of the content industry’s file-sharing litigation, eg, irrecoverable damages, bad public relations and growing disobedience of copyright norms. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:53 am by Neil H. Buchanan
"  He explains that this simple declarative sentence presented a mystery:“What was she doing at the Royal Hawaiian Hotel during Robert Kennedy’s funeral? [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 12:16 am by David Pocklington
He cited Re St Margaret, Rottingdean (No 2) [2021] ECC Chi 1 in which a faculty was granted for the the re-carving of two headstones which used offensive language concerning two music hall artistes. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
Swift J found that a new appeal would simple re-run arguments which had already been made. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
  One of the claimants, the Duke of Sussex, will be giving evidence – the first senior member of the Royal Family to give evidence since the then Prince of Wales gave evidence in the Royal Baccarat cases in 1891. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm by Joel R. Brandes
  In Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea v Bafna-Louis, 2023 WL 2387385 (S.D.N.Y., 2023) the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea (the “RBKC”) brought a petition for the return of CBL and Baby L to the United Kingdom pursuant to the Hague Convention. [read post]
26 May 2023, 9:44 am by Anisha Visvanatha
The Act is expected to receive royal assent and will then be in force on January 1, 2024. [read post]
26 May 2023, 2:00 am by Tessa Shepperson
There are an estimated 30,000 houses empty across London, with the majority in the Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, where 1,600 are lying empty. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
MGN has agreed to pay “a significant sum” in damages to royal commentator Lady Colin Campbell over an article that claimed she went on TV to defend Jeffrey Epstein’s “right to rape children”. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:51 pm
See our very first post here in which we discuss our use of the "royal we". [read post]
10 May 2023, 12:50 pm
The official document that says why you're discharged. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
Arguably, we’re so immersed in them that we know more about US law, especially relating to civil rights, than we do about Canadian rights. [read post]
8 May 2023, 4:20 am by Michael C. Dorf
First, the British royal family is arguably an economic boon via tourism and related business. [read post]