Search for: "In re SCHOOL DIST. NO. 26"
Results 81 - 100
of 102
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2010, 3:39 pm
When they’re teaching, or counseling students, they are seen as speaking on behalf of the school, and the school has broad power to control its own speech. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 11:08 am
26? [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 6:19 pm
Dist. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 4:37 pm
Dist. [read post]
7 May 2009, 3:45 am
Tri-Valley School Dist. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Maricopa County Community College Dist. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:39 am
Marlington Local School Dist. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 2:34 pm
Fayetteville, Arkansas School Dist., 2009 WL 485400 (W.D. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
Dist., No. 07-4728 (2d Cir. [read post]
29 Jan 2009, 4:42 pm
Ct. 3d Dist. 2007) "Defendant, [a convicted sex offender] . . . , was convicted following a jury trial of knowingly residing within 500 feet of a school building that persons under the age of 18 attended (720 ILCS 5/11-9.3(b-5) (West 2006). [read post]
22 Jan 2009, 2:06 am
A lot of what follows is taken in more or less edited form from the amicus brief that Bexis filed with the California Supreme Court in Conte - a copy of which we're making available, here.One major problem with Conte is that the court placed form over substance. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 8:28 pm
Engelking, No. 07-1517 In an action arising from the detention of a high school student who wrote an essay detailing a fantasy murder-suicide inspired by the Columbine school shooting, summary judgment to county and school officials is affirmed where: 1) the essay qualified as a true threat and was not protected under the First Amendment; 2) a Fourth Amendment claim failed because defendant acted pursuant to a court order and reasonably relied in good faith on a valid ex… [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
Lakeview School Dist., 2006 WL 1816452, at *3 (Ohio App. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 10:53 pm
Ct. 3d Dist. 2007) "Defendant, [a convicted sex offender] . . . , was convicted following a jury trial of knowingly residing within 500 feet of a school building that persons under the age of 18 attended (720 ILCS 5/11-9.3(b-5) (West 2006). [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
Sixth Judicial Dist. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:00 pm
Sixth Judicial Dist. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:47 am
Dist., No. 05-16434 In a case raising constitutional challenges to a public school district's mandatory dress policies or "school uniform policies," the circuit court rules that neither the school district's regulation, which created a standard dress code for all county students, nor the individual school uniform policies implemented thereunder violated plaintiffs' free speech, free exercise, or due process rights. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 6:00 am
Filed 2/26/08 The Upper Deck Co. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 8:00 am
res=9E05EEDD123EF935A15757C0A964 [read post]
24 Apr 2007, 1:54 am
School-Link Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
