Search for: "In re STATE QUESTION NO. 236"
Results 81 - 100
of 243
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Feb 2019, 7:44 am
In rebuttable the Examining Attorney relied on In re Nett Designs, Inc., 236 F.3d 1339, 57 USPQ2d 1564 (Fed. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am
The course in question covered the history of Western legal thought and philosophers such as Plato, Aquinas, Hobbes, and Mill. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm
” This modified the old rules and constitutional application in which the jury or commissioners were judges of the law and the facts. 10 In re Public Highway in Elba Twp, 236 Mich 282, 284; 210 NW 297 (1926). 11 A precise discussion of the changes in the constitution appears in State Hwy Comm v Vanderkloot, 392 Mich 159, 169-176, 191; 220 NW2d 416 (1974). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am
Penn Central left two questions. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Military Departments on the state of the services. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
“Head-of-state-owned enterprise” immunity. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
See United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
The ESA should be amended to require that if an employee is required to report for work, and the employee is scheduled to work (a) more than four hours on the day in question, the employee must receive a minimum of four hours’ pay if work starts, and a minimum of two hours’ pay if it does not; (b) less than four hours on the day in question, the employee must receive a minimum of two hours’ pay, regardless of whether work starts or not; unless the employee is… [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 8:27 am
The ESA should be amended to require that if an employee is required to report for work, and the employee is scheduled to work (a) more than four hours on the day in question, the employee must receive a minimum of four hours’ pay if work starts, and a minimum of two hours’ pay if it does not; (b) less than four hours on the day in question, the employee must receive a minimum of two hours’ pay, regardless of whether work starts or not; unless the employee is… [read post]
2 Jan 2019, 2:55 pm
See In re D.W.G., 391 S.W.3d 154, 164 (Te [read post]
16 Nov 2018, 6:45 am
" In re T [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm
Addressing only the precise question before us, and based on our analysis of the relevant statutes and precedents, we conclude that New York state and local law enforcement officers are not authorized by New York law to effectuate arrests for civil law immigration violations.The Relevant FactsThe facts are undisputed. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 9:28 am
In re D. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 1:57 pm
” In re Vitamin C Antitrust Litigation, 837 F. 3d 175, 189 (2016). [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 9:40 am
So we review questions of law de novo. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Law School as Social Innovation Lorne Sossin, Professor, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University(2017) 48 Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 225-236 [Footnotes omitted. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 6:09 am
Nabors Drilling USA L.P., 710 F.3d 234, 236 (5th Cir. 2013). [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 2:37 pm
"); id. at 236-37 ("The problem is that the decision-making process at every stage . . . is discriminatory and thus subject to bias (racial or otherwise) in its applications. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:20 am
However, in looking at the proof submitted by the husband, the Court of Appeals stated that it “need not definitively resolve the question of whether a cure is possible because, similar to what occurred in Matisoff, the proof submitted here was insufficient” (id. at 197). [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 6:20 am
However, in looking at the proof submitted by the husband, the Court of Appeals stated that it “need not definitively resolve the question of whether a cure is possible because, similar to what occurred in Matisoff, the proof submitted here was insufficient” (id. at 197). [read post]
