Search for: "In re Shaw"
Results 81 - 100
of 968
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2022, 4:09 am
We’re seeing a different generation of people, and they’re experts at social media. [read post]
21 Apr 2022, 6:01 am
” While Canadian Heritage Minister Pablo Rodriguez has agreed to re-assess the online harms policy with a new expert panel and initiated a re-branding as “online safety”, the entire consultation process is an absolute embarrassment to the government. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 3:39 am
Applicant contended that the proposed mark "is suggestive in relation to the identified goods because the juxtaposition of the two words requires the consumer to engage in multi-step reasoning since 'some degree of thought or imagination is required to understand that Applicant’s goods involve compression bandages or compression socks.'"]In re Headspace Meditation Limited, Serial No. 79281613 (March 30, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas… [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 3:00 am
If you’re not yet a member, subscribe now by emailing sales@ccrcorp.com – or call us at 800.737.1271. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 3:50 am
[Results in first comment].In re TdeltaS Limited, Serial No. 79282075 (March 17, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw). [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 4:07 am
[Answer in first comment.]In re Liquid Web LLC, Serial No. 88910823 (March 14, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cynthia C. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 4:38 am
"]In re Shell Case Limited , Serial No. 79273053 (March 8, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw). [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 1:45 am
This seemingly simple policy got tested in two recent decisions, In re Harbor Hemp Company LLC and In re AgrotecHemp Corp. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 9:12 am
The result here is that CalTech still expands the scope of estoppel beyond prior Federal Circuit precedent, but the estoppel is now limited to attempts to re-challenge the same patent claims. [read post]
21 Feb 2022, 8:25 am
“We’re Doing S’mores”: You can access today’s new episode of the “Strict Scrutiny” podcast, featuring law professors Leah Litman, Kate Shaw, and Melissa Murray, via this link. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 12:39 pm
[v] In re Trulia Inc. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 3:27 am
See In re Stanley Bros. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:30 am
"] In re Jerry Wagreich, Serial No. 87356161 (February 8, 2022) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw). [read post]
8 Feb 2022, 11:25 am
Rather than relying upon traditional judge-made principles of res judicata, Congress specified within the statute how estoppel works for IPR proceedings. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 3:45 am
If you’re on the side of morality and justice, can any reasonable person question your underlying premises? [read post]
31 Jan 2022, 4:02 am
In re Harbor Hemp Company LLC, Serial Nos. 88377702 and 88377730 (January 27, 2002) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw). [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:47 am
American Crocodile International Group, Inc., 2021 USPQ2d 831 (TTAB 2021) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas Shaw) [TTABlogged here]. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 10:04 am
Seyfarth attorneys Dawn Mertineit, Eric Barton, and Joshua Salinas will address the following topics: Recent state law changes related to restrictive covenants and non-competes and the potential impact of these changes Proposed restrictive covenant and non-compete legislation in various states Trends we’re seeing in restrictive covenant legislation and what changes we may see in 2022 Update on FTC / DOJ Non-Compete Workshop SpeakersDawn Mertineit, Partner, Seyfarth Shaw… [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Introduction: Getting pregnant Welcome to the wonderful world of making babies! [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 6:42 pm
Introduction: Getting pregnant Welcome to the wonderful world of making babies! [read post]
