Search for: "In the Matter of: Jonathan S. C-B" Results 81 - 100 of 297
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jan 2021, 1:28 pm by Jonathan Holbrook
The summaries were prepared by Shea Denning, Jamie Markham, Chris Tyner, Gabrielle Supak, and Jonathan Holbrook. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:02 am by admin
January 24, 2013 Steve Szentesi Kevin Wright (Davis LLP) (with contributions by Jonathan Gilhen – Davis LLP) Extract from a chapter to be published in CLEBC’s Annual Review of Law & Practice – 2013 ____________________ 2012 was a busy year for Canadian competition and foreign investment law, with significant developments in all major areas including misleading advertising, mergers, abuse of dominance, criminal matters (including cartels, bid-rigging… [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
Supreme Court observed that the Automatic Orders are codified within DRL § 236(B)(2)(b). [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Pursuant to this delegated authority, Chief Administrative Judge Jonathan Lippman established an Integrated Domestic Violence Part in Suffolk County with the specific authority to transfer cases pending in a local criminal court to itself (see Uniform Rules for Trial Cts [22 NYCRR] § 202.3 [c] [5]). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 6:06 am by James Bickford
  Also at Volokh, Jonathan Adler looks at the issue of standing in American Electric Power v. [read post]
8 Jun 2018, 7:20 am by Marty Lederman
  Subsection 5000A(b), in turn, provides that if (most) of those covered individuals covered by subsection (a) fail to maintain such insurance, they must pay a “shared responsibility payment” to the IRS “in the amount determined under subsection (c). [read post]
29 Apr 2020, 6:03 am by Chris Wesner
P. 8019(b)(3). 1 Tagnetics appeals the Bankruptcy Court’s October 25, 2019 “Order Granting in Part Tagnetics’ Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 101) and Ordering Other Matters” (the “October 25 Order”). [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 5:58 am by Florian Mueller
Yesterday I published the justices' copyrightability statements/questions and commented on them.Timothy B. [read post]