Search for: "Irish v. State of Maine"
Results 81 - 100
of 129
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Dec 2019, 8:22 am
The DPC filed a claim with the Irish High Court which subsequently referred the case to the ECJ along with 11 questions. [read post]
25 May 2024, 11:12 pm
[With thanks to Irish Legal News.] [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 8:27 pm
In Mercredi v. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 9:39 am
The main application had already led to another European patent (EP 2 822 751), which, however, had initially not been invoked by Graf Synergy. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:28 am
The 1709 Blog today carries this fresh-as-the-morning dew account by the IPKat's friend David Brophy (FRKelly) of discussions at today's public consultation session on the state of Irish copyright law, with special reference to fair dealing/use. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Currently pending in the U.S. courts is a case[20] in which the U.S. government is relying on the SCA to compel Microsoft to produce email stored in Ireland;[21] Microsoft is resisting on the ground that the SCA cannot compel production of data stored abroad; and the Government of Ireland has filed an amicus brief asserting its sovereignty, but conceding that it is “incumbent upon Ireland to acknowledge” that its own Supreme Court has “held that . . . there may be… [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm
United States Blog Law Online has a post dealing with the question “Is journalism harassment? [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 5:39 am
Finally he accuses the Court with some justification of relying on inappropriate precedents, including Dahlab v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 11:30 pm
This case would represent a chance for the Irish judiciary to look at again at the Crotty v An Taoiseach, a case recalled with admiration by the barrister Vincent Martin in today’s Irish Times. [read post]
23 Jun 2007, 9:44 am
(See Johnson v. [read post]
5 Jun 2022, 4:26 pm
The PDPA, originally enacted in May 2019, provides for a one-year grace period, with the main operative provisions of the law originally set to come into force in 2020. [read post]
10 Jun 2009, 10:32 pm
In Lux Traffic Controls Ltd v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 5:32 am
The Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdogan has described social media as one of the main threats to democracy. [read post]
27 May 2012, 5:42 pm
UN member states asked the UK about ‘super-injunctions’, online freedom of expression and the defamation bill: “The UK’s representative at the review, Lord McNally, responded to the questions and recommendations regarding defamation and its impact on freedom of expression by stating that ‘his baby’ aimed to get the balance right between a free media and the right of the individual to privacy, and that it was regarded as a ‘good law’… [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 3:22 am
For that reason, the “determination of a fact-finder as to the value of a business, if it is within the range of testimony presented, will not be disturbed on appeal where the valuation rests primarily on the credibility of the expert witnesses and their valuation techniques” (Matter of Wright v Irish, 156 AD3d 803 [2d Dept 2017]). [read post]
16 Sep 2024, 7:10 am
In 2020 the defendant created public Substack account, the main purpose of which he says was to publish articles around gender ideology and women’s rights. [read post]
13 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
There are also a number of resolved cases: A woman v Lancashire Telegraph (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); A man v The Sun (Clauses 4, 5, 6, 11/01/2013); Mrs Emma Drury-Ward v Chat (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Ms Tina Hallett & Mr Jonathan Apps v Daily Mail (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); A man v Daily Mail (Clauses 1, 3, 11/01/2013); Sarah Cookv Easy Living, (Clause 3, 11/01/2013); Mr Joe Cooke v The Daily Telegraph (Clause 1, 11/01/2013); Mr Bruce Elliott… [read post]
4 May 2022, 6:58 pm
If Roe v. [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm
The US government has said that the Irish Data Protection Commissioner’s action querying the validity of the main channels being used for EU-US data transfers is “of the utmost importance to the United States and to the broader public”. [read post]
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm
This specific issue has been tackled by the Court of Justice in GC et al v CNIL (C-136/17) finding that Article 9’s permitting of exceptions “necessary for reasons of substantial public interest, on the basis of Union or Member State law” (GDPR, art. 9(2)(g)) could be invoked by Google even in the absence of any Union or Member State statutory provision providing for this and even apparently as regards criminal-related data as specified in article 10 not… [read post]
