Search for: "J L S Holdings LLC"
Results 81 - 100
of 641
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 May 2022, 6:10 am
[Closing out Week Two of our FTC UMC Rulemaking symposium is a contribution from a very special guest: Commissioner Noah J. [read post]
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
Our holding should also be of special interest to those concerned with the evolution of surveillance by state actors or by those purporting to act at their direction. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm
The Second Circuit’s Decision The Honorable William J. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
David L. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
L. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 3:25 pm
Defendant AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC, a subsidiary of AT&T Inc., owned 98.119% of the general partnership and controlled its operations. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:30 am
For the second year in a row, the International Ombudsman Association will hold its annual conference virtually. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
SINGAS, J. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am
SINGAS, J. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 3:00 am
Katie Porter and Raúl Grijalva sent a letter to six public relations firms, asking for details on their work with energy companies and whether they had aided them in campaigns to obscure the link between fossil fuels and climate change. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
The trial court rejected Joan Frank’s claim that the agreement was unenforceable under the HSSA (…) The trial court also rejected Joan Frank’s claim that the plaintiff had failed to mitigate its damages, finding that it was Joan Frank who had ‘‘wrongfully prevented’’ the removal of the home furnishings and décor. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 4:01 am
Text Copyright John L. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 5:00 am
William J. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:48 pm
While a use provision need not expressly use the words “used for,” see StoreWALL, LLC v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
The counterclaim for defamation was rejected in Musst Holdings v Astra Asset Management [2021] EWHC 3432 (Ch) on the basis that it was not proven that there was a publication as alleged and that the actual or natural and probable requisite loss had not been proven. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 2:22 pm
Joiner, 522 U.S. 136, 145-46 (1997) (holding that an expert witness’s reliance on a study was misplaced when the subjects of the study “had been exposed to numerous potential carcinogens”) First Circuit Bricklayers & Trowel Trades Internat’l Pension Fund v. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
Can you register a famous person’s name as your trademark without their consent? [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
USA, LLC (2020) (Statement by Thomas, J.). [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 12:27 pm
Empire Ent., LLC, No. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
University Club reaffirmed the narrowness of the D.C. statute, holding that it doesn't apply to a club's ejecting a member because of his general political beliefs (as opposed to party affiliation).[8] Arboleda v. [read post]
