Search for: "J. DOE # 1"
Results 81 - 100
of 14,437
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2023, 8:56 am
Matter of J-G-P- does not purport to reassess longstanding BIA and Ninth Circuit precedent concerning simple assault offenses, and because it misapplied that precedent, its conclusion is unreasonable. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 9:02 pm
by Marcus J. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 5:01 pm
Decision J 20/05 should thus be reconsidered. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:15 am
Does 1-101, No. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 7:56 am
This does not, in principle, seem like an unreasonable requirement to me, and sometimes it may even be desirable. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 12:20 pm
J. [read post]
10 Aug 2018, 12:56 am
Aspects that should be considered are, in particular, how long the proceedings before the national courts or authorities have been pending, the duration of the suspension and whether the request for suspension of the grant proceedings was filed at a late stage (J 6/10, point 4.2 of the reasons; J 7/10, point 4.1 of the reasons; J 15/13, point 2.5 of the reasons; J 33/03, point 2.2 of the reasons).These criteria have not to be fulfilled cumulatively, and they may… [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 5:18 am
The full reasoning will be provided in the written decision.File wrapper: EP 18 275 163 (J 8/20) and EP 18 275 174 (J 9/20)Also refer to our earlier blog post in respect of the refusal by the Receiving Section here.The above comments reflect my personal understanding of what was discussed at the oral proceedings. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm
The same is true where, as in the present case, the description referred to Figures 1 to 11, but no Figure 11 was filed: Figure 11 was clearly missing (see also J 15/12). [read post]
12 Jun 2014, 7:00 am
However, a suit alleging interception does not preclude an additional lawsuit alleging different causes of action. [read post]
26 Sep 2007, 7:38 pm
DISTRICT ATTORNEY et al.CALKINS, J.[ ¶1] John Doe appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Studstrup, J.) granting Evert Fowle, Craig Poulin, and Everett Flannery's motions to dismiss, and dismissing Doe's complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. [read post]
24 Jul 2013, 3:18 am
Does 1-28, No. 13 C 3839, Slip Op. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
German is an official language of the EPO, so the exception of Rule 36(2) does not appear to apply. [read post]
8 May 2013, 7:33 am
United Online, Inc., et. al., 1-13-cv-00343 (ILND May 3, 2013, Order) (Lefkow, J.). [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 3:21 am
Does 1-800, No. 10 C 5603, Slip Op. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
Rule 14 EPC 1973 can prevent, as lex specialis, other acts, e.g., as in J 20/05, the filing of a divisional application (see also G 1/09 [3.2.5], and J 9/12 [3,5]). [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:18 am
Does 1-1000, No. 10 C 5604, Slip Op. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 12:05 pm
(Mark, J.) in which the court held that the trustee does not have the ability to administer exempt property for domestic support obligation ("DSO") creditors pursuant to new section 522(c)(1). [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 3:01 pm
A communication under R 108(3) is due from the EPO only in case of loss of rights under paragraph 1 or 2 of that Rule, which does not encompass the lack of payment of the renewal fee in respect of the third year due upon entry into the regional phase under R 107(1)(g). [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 3:02 am
Does 1-31, No. 11 C 9064, Slip Op. [read post]
