Search for: "J. M. Simmons" Results 81 - 100 of 129
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Feb 2015, 4:13 am by Ben
"I'm an Internet junkie myself" he said. [read post]
16 Oct 2022, 6:51 pm by Bill Marler
As of May 31, 2022, a total of 18 outbreak-associated cases of hepatitis A have been reported from 3 states – California (16), Minnesota (1), and North Dakota (1). [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm by Ilana Korchia
Hepatitis A outbreaks associated with fresh, frozen, and minimally processed produce, worldwide, from 1983 to 2016—adapted and expanded from Sivapalasingam et al., 2004 and Fiore, 2004. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 1:04 pm by Giles Peaker
The agreement is express and clear from the outset that it is a license and in any case as per J Spurling Ltd v [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 12:05 pm by Richard Hunt
Nonetheless, I’m happy to act on a temporary basis as Virgil and see how far we can get. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 6:57 pm
González Pérez - Universitat de les Illes Balears COL / Social Research in the Era of Analytics and Big Data José Manuel Magallanes - University of Washington and Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú Ernesto Calvo - University of Maryland CSS / Civil Society and Social Movements Gonzalo Delamaza - Universidad de Los Lagos Adrian… [read post]
19 Apr 2008, 8:50 am
I'm back from the two-day "Future of the Global Law Firm" symposium at Georgetown Law School, which was organized by Prof. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 12:08 pm by Eleonora Rosati
Ba ba ba, bye BabybelFromageries Bel v J Sainsbury Plc [2019] EWHC 3454 (December 2019)Fact of the day: I don’t like cheese (you could say I’m not fondue it). [read post]
17 Oct 2018, 3:59 am
Darren Meale of Simmons & Simmons presents his fourth instalment [previously: here, here, here] of the Retromark trade mark litigation round up.This time around we have eight worthy UK and EU cases for you, including some big hitters in the form of Cartier, Louboutin and – because Retromark wouldn’t be complete without one – the latest round of theKit Kat saga. 1. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 11:30 am
After all of the complicated arguments in the wage/penalty debate, future points and authorities regarding the issue can now be boiled down to a single sentence and citation: The "additional hour of pay" due to an employee under Labor Code § 226.7 is a wage, not a penalty. [read post]