Search for: "JR v. IR " Results 81 - 100 of 209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2019, 5:30 am by Embajador Microjuris al Día
En la opinión, escrita por el juez Samuel Alito Jr., se razonó que la lectura más natural de la ley requiere que el emplezamiento y la demanda deben ir directamente a la oficina del ministerio de asuntos exteriores en el país extranjero. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 3:06 pm by Michael Grossman
A pair of favored examples are Liebeck v McDonald’s Restaurants, aka “The Hot Coffee Case,” and Pearson v Chung, or “The Pants Lawsuit. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 10:48 am by Kelly
Naylor, Jr. is a Washington state software engineer who holds a number of patents. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:48 am by maureen
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 11:10 am by maureen
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 10:56 am by maureen
TAX ADVICE DISCLOSURE To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S. federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for = the purpose of (1) avoiding penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any matters = addressed herein. =20… [read post]