Search for: "Jackson v. Wood" Results 81 - 100 of 242
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Oct 2018, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
28 Oct 2018, 5:09 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Warby J will heard the final day of the libel trial of Doyle v Smith. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 9:25 am by Lyle Denniston
Alabama - constitutionality of life-without-parole sentence for minor who commits murder 10-9647 — Jackson v. [read post]
8 Oct 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  Kennedy v National Trust for Scotland, heard 25 and 26 July 2018 (Sharp, Asplin LJJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
The most devoted Evelyn Woods enthusiast couldn't plow through all the cases that get ginned out over a day, in addition to taking a shower and shaving, and working for a living. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 7:50 am
 Wood (1973), 36 Ohio St. 2d 101, 105-106. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
On 19 December 2018 Nicklin J handed down judgment in the “Twitter libel” case of Monir v Wood [2018] EWHC 3525 (QB). [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 5:19 am by Mark Graber
  Alvis, Bailey and Taylor note some minor legal differences between the defenses of congressional delegation theory advanced by Justice Louis Brandeis and James McReynolds in Myers v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
Last week marked the 60th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 7:22 pm
Pursuant to Code Crim.Proc., § 280 and as held in People v Jackson, People v Krank, except where time is a material ingredient of the crime the prosecution is not confined in its evidence to the precise date laid in the indictment, but may prove that the offense was committed at any time prior to the commencement of the prosecution and such proof does not constitute a material variance. [read post]