Search for: "Jammie Thomas-Rasset" Results 81 - 100 of 247
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2009, 12:08 pm
" This was the second trial for the woman, Jammie Thomas-Rasset, in the first downloading case to go to trial. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 9:13 am
According to this article in p2pnet.net, Kazaa, which is now a business partner of the RIAA/Big 4 record companies, is referring to the Jammie Thomas-Rasset case in its advertising, saying "they" are going to "come at you like they came at tereastarr". [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 11:48 am by David Kravets
Jammie Thomas-Rasset testifies in her first civil trial in 2007, while U.S. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 1:12 am
Die Filesharerin Jammie Thomas Rasset wurde wegen des Verbreitens von 24 Musiktiteln zu 1.8 Mio Dollar Schadensersatz verurteilt. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:13 am by Ray Beckerman
Jammie Thomas-Rasset, the US Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit: -held that the award of $222,000, or $9250 per song, is not an unconstitutional violation of due process, and-did not reach the "making available" issue. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 2:13 pm by David Kravets
Jammie Thomas-Rasset testifies in her first civil trial in 2007, while U.S. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 11:10 am by Cyrus Farivar
A three-judge panel on the United States Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit ruled (PDF) Tuesday in the case of a Minnesota woman, Jammie Thomas-Rasset, who has been fighting music piracy legal battles since 2007. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:13 am
Friday's news saw the announcement of a $1.9 million verdict against Jammie Thomas-Rasset, a Minnesota mother of four, for illegal music downloads. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:02 am
Nothing better illustrates the profound inequity of capping noneconomic damages than the verdicts against file sharers: Jammie Thomas-Rasset, the Minnesota woman who has been fighting the recording industry over 24 songs she illegally downloaded and shared online four years ago, has lost another round in court. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 7:28 am by Ray Beckerman
Thomas-Rasset, the defendant has filed a motion for reconsideration requesting the Court to now reach the constitutional due process issue which it had declined to reach in its prior decision setting aside the verdict on the ground of remittitur, but not on the basis of due process.Defendant submitted Judge Gertner's decision in SONY v. [read post]
6 Nov 2010, 2:32 am by Josh Sturtevant
which has included settlement offers and two previous jury decisions, a third jury decided that Jammie Thomas-Rasset owed the RIAA $62,500...per song. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 6:24 pm by Doug
Jammie Thomas-Rasset has been battling the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) for the last four years in one of the RIAA’s “top 3? [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 9:16 pm by Doug
The Minneapolis jury determined Jammie Thomas-Rasset was responsible for $1.5 million in damages for distributing 24 songs on the KaZaA peer-to-peer file sharing network. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:19 am by admin
The Supreme Court on Monday let stand a jury’s conclusion that Jammie Thomas-Rasset pay the recording industry $222,000 for downloading and sharing two dozen copyrighted songs on the now-defunct file-sharing service Kazaa. [read post]
23 Jul 2011, 8:21 pm by Doug Isenberg
District Judge Michael Davis follows the third trial in the Recording Industry Association of America’s lawsuit against Jammie Thomas-Rasset, the first file sharer to take an RIAA lawsuit to a jury trial. [read post]