Search for: "Jane C. Ginsburg"
Results 81 - 100
of 114
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Apr 2010, 1:48 pm
Columbia (#6): Jane Ginsburg? [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 5:23 am
~Jane Fraytet~ What do you think? [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 1:06 pm
Columbia Law Professor Jane C. [read post]
4 Oct 2009, 7:21 pm
Jane Ginsburg wrote an article in 2003 entitled "How Copyright Got a Bad Name For itself. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 6:25 am
Jane Ginsburg’s argument: no need to define separability b/c this is just a question of applying a 2D design to an object.Samuelson: thinks they’re going to reverse; they were caught up with the camo metaphor. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 9:18 am
Different purpose cases: 16 of 50 cases in past three years. 7 were easily fair use, even by Jane Ginsburg’s lights—e.g., guy who sued lawyer who distributed his CV to court and opposing parties as part of considering him as expert witness; use of blog for disciplinary proceedings; eBay resales of magazines featuring photo on front cover. [read post]
10 Feb 2020, 8:59 am
Jane Ginsburg’s work on this is similar. [read post]
15 Aug 2024, 9:33 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK In a recent Columbia Public Law research paper, Jane C. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:31 am
Jane Ginsburg: Author-unfriendliness is another nasty effect of the notice requirement. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 9:27 am
Fletcher / C. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 3:40 am
This does not mean that these facts have to automatically point to an activity being absolutely and conclusively illegal (citing Jane Ginsburg’s 2008 article in 50 Ariz. [read post]
26 Mar 2008, 4:15 am
Jane Ginsburg, Columbia Law SchoolProf. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 10:22 pm
Donaldson Lithographing Company: Originality As A Vehicle For Copyright Inclusivity, in Jane C. [read post]
3 Nov 2023, 1:50 pm
Jane M. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:34 pm
Jane C. [read post]
11 Dec 2006, 6:47 am
Jane Ginsburg: The exclusions in the current act should deal with many First Amendment issues, so what problems are left? [read post]
28 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
Sotomayor was tasked in interpreting section 201(c) of the Copyright Act which deals the rights of owners of collective works, i.e. whether the Times as a collective works owner could reuse the journalists' works absent any express authorization. [read post]
11 Jun 2008, 11:25 am
These blog entries should be extremely useful to any law student currently using Trademark and Unfair Competition Law; Cases and Materials, written by Jane C. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 3:13 pm
John C. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 11:00 am
Gorman & Jane C. [read post]
