Search for: "Jay Memo Bybee"
Results 81 - 100
of 169
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Aug 2009, 1:57 am
They were the get out of jail free card.Next, we have Jack Goldsmith carefully dancing around the Yoo/Bybee torture memos in a pair of letters to the CIA dated May 27th 2004 and July 7, 2004. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 7:18 pm
" More important, the scope of the "review" is limited at the outsetto those who failed to "act in good faith and within the scope of legal guidance" -- meaning only those interrogators and other officials who exceeded the torture limits which John Yoo and Jay Bybee approved. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 9:57 am
Yoo’s direct supervisor, Assistant Attorney General Jay Bybee, told the inspectors general that he was not “read into” the surveillance program and had no idea how Yoo “became the White House’s guy” to advise it on serious constitutional matters. [read post]
12 Jul 2009, 1:36 pm
What about Jay Bybee, then John Yoo's supervisor? [read post]
18 May 2009, 6:05 pm
VELVETREVOLUTION.US : The DisbarTortureLawyers Campaign On Monday, May 18, 2009, a broad coalition of organizations (Velvet Revolution.US), filed disciplinary complaints with state bar licensing boards against John Yoo, Jay Bybee, Stephen Bradbury, Alberto Gonzales, John Ashcroft, Michael Chertoff, Alice Fisher, William Haynes II, Douglas Feith, Michael Mukasey, Timothy Flanigan, and David Addington for advocating the torture [...] [read post]
18 May 2009, 11:29 am
Permit me to invent a similar but short memo that will allow the reader, without reading the approximately 120 densely packed pages of the four memos, to grasp their style, their character, their techniques, their aims, and, inherently and unavoidably, the nature of the people who wrote or signed off on them: John Yoo, Jay Bybee and Steven Bradbury. [read post]
15 May 2009, 8:03 am
But the “reasonable people” on the jury that may try John Yoo or Jay Bybee would have an different task: to determine guilt. [read post]
14 May 2009, 1:58 am
[JURIST] Former head of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) [official website] and federal judge Jay Bybee [official profile], who signed off on memos detailing the legal rationale for enhanced interrogation techniques, has declined an invitation to testify [JURIST report] before the US Senate Judiciary Committee [official website], committee chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) [official profile] said [ [read post]
13 May 2009, 9:04 pm
Circuit Judge Jay Bybee has declined to give Senate testimony on the memos he approved while at the Justice Department that supported harsh interrogation methods for detainees. [read post]
13 May 2009, 2:38 pm
Senators today debated whether they should investigate John Yoo, Jay Bybee and Stephen Bradbury, former lawyers with the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, over their involvement with memos that authorized harsh interrogation practices. [read post]
8 May 2009, 4:05 pm
Both articles also addressed calls for disbarring those lawyers, as well as for impeaching Jay Bybee, who is now a federal judge. [read post]
7 May 2009, 12:22 pm
Permit me to invent a similar but short memo that will allow the reader, without reading the approximately 120 densely packed pages of the four memos, to grasp their style, their character, their techniques, their aims, and, inherently and unavoidably, the nature of the people who wrote or signed off on them: John Yoo, Jay Bybee and Steven Bradbury. [read post]
7 May 2009, 9:10 am
"Judge takes step to air his views; UNLV fellow, Bush memo author seeks to meet Titus": Today's edition of The Las Vegas Sun contains an article that begins, "As criticism of federal appellate court Judge Jay Bybee mounts for authorizing harsh interrogation techniques as a Bush administration lawyer, the Nevada jurist has reached out to members of the state's congressional delegation, apparently to tell his side of the story. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:42 am
In some ways, the controversy concerning John Yoo and Jay Bybee — the former Bush administration lawyers who wrote memos sanctioning the CIA’s use of harsh interrogation techniques, is dying down. [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:23 am
The Justice Department said it’s nearing the completion of an internal probe expected to recommend professional sanctions — but no criminal prosecution — of John Yoo and Jay Bybee (pictured) — two principal authors of the memos. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 6:46 am
[JURIST] Chairman of the US Senate Judiciary Committee [official website] Patrick Leahy (D-VT) [official profile; JURIST news archive] on Wednesday invited [press release and letter] former head of the Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) [official website] and federal judge Jay Bybee [official profile], who signed off on memos detailing the legal rationale for enhanced interrogation techniques, to [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 6:32 am
Former UNLV law professor Jay Bybee said none constituted torture while working for Bush. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 1:15 pm
Leahy today invited federal judge Jay S. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 7:44 am
Judge Jay Bybee broke his silence on the torture memos Tuesday, in responses to questions from the New York Times. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 6:42 am
Think Progress reports that Judge Bybee has been asked to testify before the Senate Judiciary Committee:Today, Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) sent a letter to Judge Jay Bybee inviting him to testify about his "views" about torture and his "role" in drafting the torture memos. [read post]
