Search for: "Jeremy Strong v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 137
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Yahoo News – Michael Bender and Anjali Huynh (New York Times) | Published: 11/29/2023 Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
On 27 June 2019 the Culture Secretary, Jeremy Wright, made a written statement to Parliament having opened an investigation into the Evening Standard and Independent after an investor with “strong links” to the Saudi state bought shares in their parent companies. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 1:02 am by INFORRM
The legislation’s stated aim is to regulate digital media platforms, such as social media sites or search engines, by promoting voluntary commercial agreements between the platform and news outlets. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 8:46 am
District Judge Jeremy Fogel called the state's "pervasive lack of professionalism" in carrying out executions "deeply disturbing. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
In a strong form, we wouldn’t care about passing off either. [read post]
11 Mar 2021, 2:33 pm by Lundgren & Johnson, PSC
More recently, the Supreme Court decided the case of Presley v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:44 pm
”The difficulty here is that many states, having refused to legislate in favour of text and data-mining, are presumably not convinced of their merit. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
“There already is a rather strong regulation against hacking people’s telephones – the law. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 8:26 pm by justinsilverman
  In this case there’s a fairly strong argument that the 27-second clip of Bouchard is fair. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
[All of the above introduction was prepared by the blogmeister Jeremy. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:55 pm
But unlike the UNGP, and like the Guiding Principles for Human Rights and the Environment, these would be directed to states directly (with a derivative obligation of states to discipline “their” enterprises—though this presumption is itself subject to strong reservation). [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
11 Aug 2020, 6:00 am by Guest Blogger
” And, at a similarly crucial point in Matal v. [read post]