Search for: "Jeremy Strong v. State"
Results 81 - 100
of 135
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jul 2013, 6:19 pm
The Omnipresent State Sector 552 2. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 8:05 pm
Thanks to Jeremy Marwell and V&E summer associate Varun Jain for compiling and drafting this update. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 9:13 am
Playing with reality v. paper rights to compromise reflecting different systems. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 2:43 pm
Jeremy Sheff (St. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 6:11 am
Saionton was previously the law clerk to the Chief Justice of India, V N Khare. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 5:17 am
[All of the above introduction was prepared by the blogmeister Jeremy. [read post]
24 Sep 2012, 5:00 am
Background In DigiTelCom, Ltd., et al., v. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 10:58 am
" It's by Jeremy Byellin of Thomson Reuters. [read post]
22 Jul 2012, 5:42 pm
Parkinson v. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 10:14 pm
I have discussed the reform with members of Congress and it has been debated in prior years.2004... 2002... this is post-Bush v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 2:45 pm
Joseph Sanders (University of Houston): Milward v. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 8:29 am
In Holder v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:50 pm
by Jeremy Leaming Arizona’s racial profiling law, which has prompted other states to enact or consider similar measures, appears to have a strong chance of surviving Supreme Court scrutiny. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:18 am
Americans v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:34 pm
Jeremy Sheff, St. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 5:57 pm
Jeremy Bentham said in a well known passage quoted by Lord Shaw of Dunfermline in Scott v Scott [1913] AC 417, 477: Publicity is the very soul of justice. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 3:39 pm
This function is famously associated with Jeremy Bentham. [read post]
7 Apr 2012, 12:58 pm
R (on the application of Amada Bizimana) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 414 In the wake of France’s apparently unencumbered expulsion of individuals on public interest grounds there has been a fresh outcry from the press about the shackles imposed by the Human Rights Convention on the UK authorities which other signatory states seem to ignore with impunity. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:55 am
Given that Blogmeister Jeremy is attending the Pharmaceutical Trade Marks Group Conference in Brussels this very week, this Kat thought it prudent to tell you about a recent decision of the General Court of Justice of the European Union involving just that: Cadila Healthcare Ltd v OHIM and Novartis AG (Case T-288/08, 15 March 2012). [read post]
