Search for: "Jesse Baker"
Results 81 - 100
of 149
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Mar 2017, 12:20 pm
Background: “In Fall of Gorsuch’s Mother, a Painful Lesson in Politicking,” by Adam Liptak, Peter Baker, Nicholas Fandos and Julie Turkewitz, published by The New York Times on February 4, 2017 “A Jeffersonian for the Supreme Court,” by Jeffrey Rosen, published by The Atlantic on February 1, 2017 “Gorsuch Has Strong Tie to Proponent of Morality-Based ‘Natural Law’,” by Jess Bravin, published by The Wall Street Journal on March… [read post]
8 May 2019, 4:26 pm
You may have read Iain Baker of Jesus Jones story of the band’s encounter with Pledge that we posted here and hear. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:17 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the court will consider during oral argument next week whether the First Amendment bars Colorado from requiring a baker to create a cake for a same-sex wedding. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 4:37 am
“I had to get a copy from somebody else,” Jesse Ceniceros, president of VIW told WorkCompCentral. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:58 am
Peter Baker and Carl Hulse of the New York Times describe the Republicans as balancing a desire to avoid be labeled as obstructionist against the opportunity to highlight their differences with the Democrats. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am
” At Restructuring Debt Review, Brandy Sargent discusses the Court’s recent opinion in Baker Botts v. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
” At The Daily Signal, Jim Campbell recounts a day spent with Jack Phillips, the baker who refused on religious grounds to make a custom cake for a same-sex wedding and who prevailed last month in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 7:02 am
Meanwhile, Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal focuses on the Justice’s support for life tenure for federal judges. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:07 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the court will decide whether the First Amendment bars Colorado from requiring a baker to create a cake for a same-sex wedding; he maintains that although “[s]ome may say that [a decision in favor of the baker] prioritizes one right over another – the right of freedom of speech, or perhaps the freedom of religion — over the right not to suffer invidious discrimination,” such a decision would instead “put these… [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 4:18 am
” At The Atlantic, Garrett Epps finds echoes of past justices in the case, arguing that the modern democracy shaped by the court’s 1962 decision in Baker v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 11:57 am
State of Indiana , a 15-page opinion, Chief Judge Baker writes:Appellant-defendant Kevin L. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 6:30 am
(Harvard University Press, 2020), and Jesse Wegman, Let the People Pick the President: The Case for Abolishing the Electoral College (St. [read post]
12 Jan 2019, 4:52 am
Stewart Baker shared this week’s Cyberlaw Podcast, which consisted of a news roundup: In this week’s SinoTech, Rachel Brown and Preston Lin discussed U.S. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 1:31 pm
Philadelphia police arrested Eric Archer for shooting Officer Jesse Hartnett three times during an ambush. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:08 am
” Jess Bravin reports for The Wall Street Journal that “[d]uring arguments, each side asserted that their position protected small businesses. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:32 am
” Jess Bravin of the Wall Street Journal describes Kagan’s involvement in the Paula Jones suit. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 4:15 am
Jess Bravin reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
3 Jul 2019, 4:05 am
Jess Bravin and Janet Ademy report for The Wall Street Journal that “[t]he decision to stop pursuing the citizenship question was made just hours before it became public. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:13 am
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, in which the court will decide whether the First Amendment bars Colorado from requiring a baker to create a cake for a same-sex wedding, are framing their arguments to “fight for Justice Kennedy’s vote. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 4:30 am
” For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin and Brent Kendall report that the justices held “that Minnesota went too far in banning all political buttons and apparel at polling stations, but said more limited electioneering restrictions most other states enforce are acceptable. [read post]
