Search for: "Jesse Jacobs" Results 81 - 100 of 145
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jan 2012, 6:29 am by Kiran Bhat
Briefly: Writing at the Atlantic, Andrew Cohen considers some of the reasons why the Court may have so many cases of political interest on its docket ahead of the 2012 presidential election In a follow-up to a piece that Joshua noted in yesterday’s round-up, Jacob Sullum of Reason reports on a Brennan Center study challenging the notion that the Roberts Court is a staunch supporter of free speech. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
Jacobs Visiting Professor of Law and Economics Harvard Law School Isaac Corré Senior Managing Director Eton Park Capital Management L.P. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am by Amy Howe
  In the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Tony Mauro reported on the atmosphere in the Courtroom when the ruling was issued, while in The Wall Street Journal Jess Bravin investigates what Congress actually meant by the phrase “established by the State. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 7:28 am by Allison Trzop
Jacobs of Greenwire reports on two environmental cases on today’s Conference. [read post]
6 Jul 2020, 3:38 am by Edith Roberts
” At Subscript Law, Jacob Baldinger has an infographic explainer for last week’s decision in U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:31 am by Amy Howe
  Lyle Denniston covered the decision for this blog, with other coverage coming from David Savage of the Los Angeles Times, NPR’s Nina Totenberg, Jeremy Jacobs of Greenwire, and Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:12 am by Broc Romanek
I want to thank Jesse Brill for believing in me (his family owns the company; not me). [read post]
5 May 2020, 3:54 am by Edith Roberts
Jacob Baldinger discusses the issues in the case at Subscript Law, which also provides a graphic explainer. [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 6:37 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
Other coverage includes reports by Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal, Martha Neil of the ABA Journal, and Bill Mears of CNN. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:24 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Members of the Rockland Pill Network include: THOOMPALLY, DAVID JACOBS, THOMAS ZIEGLER, FELICE BASSI, JESSE BAILEY, FIRAS YOUSEF, ALEX FUSCO, JOHN BRUN, VINCENT KRASINSKI, and MELANIE DECORT. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 6:05 am by Sarah Erickson-Muschko
” Additional coverage of the oral arguments comes from Nina Totenberg at NPR, Adam Liptak of The New York Times, Pete Williams of NBC News, Mike Dorf at Dorf on Law, Brett Norman of Politico, Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers, Jesse J. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am by Chuck Ramsay
Olson, Mark Allen, Jacob Heefner, Carson Orwig, Lee Ahern, Paul Heiligman, Joel Osborn, Sharon Anderson, Andrea Ryan … [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 6:24 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Members of the Rockland Pill Network include: THOOMPALLY, DAVID JACOBS, THOMAS ZIEGLER, FELICE BASSI, JESSE BAILEY, FIRAS YOUSEF, ALEX FUSCO, JOHN BRUN, VINCENT KRASINSKI, and MELANIE DECORT. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Duke Center for Firearms Law’s Second Thoughts blog, Jacob Charles looks at the implications of Rehaif v. [read post]
31 Oct 2024, 2:39 pm by Stuart Tubis
Plaintiffs: Michael Harrison, Ruben Paul Gonzales, Adam Ghadiri Shahbaz Law Group Attorneys: Jacob Shahbaz, Esq., Ralph Ayala, Esq. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 3:24 am by Seán Binder
Jess Bravin reports for the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 11:49 am by Brad Small
Others, including Jesse Ventura and Glen Jacobs pka Kane, become politicians. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:04 am
Masulis (University of New South Wales), Cong Wang (The Chinese University of Hong Kong), and Fei Xie (University of Delaware), on Monday, February 4, 2019 Tags: Behavioral finance, Employees, Equity-based compensation, Incentives, Management, Mergers & acquisitions, Ownership structure, Shareholder value, Shareholder voting, Takeovers The Risky Business of Investing in Chinese Tech Firms Posted by Jesse M. [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 4:19 am by Edith Roberts
” At Pacific Standard, Tom Jacobs looks at a recent study that “analyzed the transcripts of 3,583 oral arguments presented to the court over more than three decades” and found that “’female lawyers are interrupted earlier and more often, allowed to speak for less time between interruptions, and subjected to more and longer speeches by the justices compared to male lawyers. [read post]