Search for: "Jewell v. Price" Results 81 - 92 of 92
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2010, 1:59 am
 Consumers continue to pay the price for this intentional bait and switch. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 2:19 pm
” eBay also purchased advertising space on search engines, in some instances providing a link to eBay's site and exhorting the reader to “Find tiffany items at low prices. [read post]
25 May 2009, 11:05 am
Note 14 alone is worth the Price of admission: it should be quoted verbatim in discovery letters.How to Use: Price is an embarrassment of riches: here's two jewels. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 7:00 am
: G-Star v Pepsico (Class 46)   Nigeria Nigeria celebrates 20 years of copyright law (Afro-IP)   Poland Confusion around ARENDA (Class 46) Inspiration or plagiarism? [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 12:30 pm
In Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Prouds Jewellers Pty Ltd  [2008] FCA 75 the Federal Court held that 'Was/Now' discount advertising by Prouds Jewellers Pty Ltd was misleading in breach of the Trade Practices Act 1974. [read post]