Search for: "John Doe Companies A-Z" Results 81 - 98 of 98
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Mar 2010, 3:42 am by Sam E. Antar
Management does not believe the litigation will have a material adverse effect on the Company or its subsidiaries. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 7:33 pm by Adam Thierer
From 1979-2009, total license fees paid by cable & satellite companies to support C-SPAN totaled $922 million. [read post]
21 Feb 2010, 7:14 pm
 However, this does bring up a secondary issue in that while a select few receive an astronomical benefit from the NCAA, the greater portion of student-athletes may face an overall detriment. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:32 pm by Bill Marler
The lawsuit also names as yet unidentified “John Doecompanies that may have been involved in distributing the tainted meat products. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 1:42 am
Copyright Act does not apply because the company has licenses to distribute the music in the United States. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 8:20 am
Does that mean the VCs were foolish to invest in Delicious? [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 6:49 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com]   Highlights this week included: YouTube – Prince demands removal of song from YouTube, Radiohead demand it is put back online: (Techdirt), (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (The Trademark Blog), Japan planning fair use provision: (Michael Geist), (Techdirt), (IP Justice), (Patry Copyright Blog), Judge rejects Yoko Ono’s request for preliminary injunction… [read post]
24 May 2008, 9:01 am
And it takes a lot of guts to head up a successful record company, only to eventually leave it for an even better deal - but (again) that’s exactly what Jay-Z did. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 10:55 am
But the internet may make it possible to overcome the walled off character of reading, the more so as Google's book project proceeds and as other companies undertake the same or similar projects. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 6:25 pm
(source) WV&Z agrees with Edwin Coe on this point. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 10:24 am
Having affirmed the 8(a)(1) finding on this basis, Member Kirsanow found it unnecessary to pass on the judge's additional finding of an 8(a)(1) violation based on Roggero's statement that she does not do business with organizations that file complaints with the Department of Consumer Protection and cost her company money. [read post]