Search for: "John Doe No. 142" Results 81 - 100 of 162
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Sep 2010, 5:34 pm by Danielle Citron
This history does not purport to offer a definitive explanation of the dynamics of civil rights reform and lawmaking. [read post]
14 May 2008, 3:04 am
" The commissioners are Hans van Houtte (President), George Aldrich, John Crook, James Paul and me, Lucy Reed. [read post]
22 May 2018, 9:18 pm by David Frakt
   And therein lies the rub, for the mean LSAT score for African Americans is 142, and the mean score for Hispanic LSAT takers is 146. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 2:15 pm by Eugene Volokh
Higginson, A Short History of the Right To Petition Government for the Redress of Grievances, 96 Yale L.J. 142, 155 (1986); James E. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 6:24 pm by David Frakt
John’s             160/158/154       157/151/148                       34                           St. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  At the same time, there is great value in taking account of broader trends, as Huq does when he identifies distinctions in the treatment of different types of constitutional claims. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am by John L. Welch
Dep’t of the Interior, 142 U.S.P.Q. 506 (TTAB 1964), where it reversed a refusal to register a logo of the National Park Service. [read post]
25 Oct 2009, 3:10 pm
” At about the same time, New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) Chairman John Thain spoke with Schaeffer about NYSE purchasing NYMEX for $142 per share, which represented a large premium above NYMEX’s then trading price. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
July 1, 2018Appellate Division, First DepartmentFirst Department Holds Brooke’s Reasoning Applies with Equal Force Where Child Is Legally Adopted by One Partner and Other Partner Claims He or She Is A AParent@With Co‑Equal Rights Because Of Preadoption Agreement. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:32 pm by Joel R. Brandes
July 1, 2018Appellate Division, First DepartmentFirst Department Holds Brooke’s Reasoning Applies with Equal Force Where Child Is Legally Adopted by One Partner and Other Partner Claims He or She Is A AParent@With Co‑Equal Rights Because Of Preadoption Agreement. [read post]