Search for: "Joint Motion for Parties' Proposed Briefing Schedule"
Results 81 - 100
of 130
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2013, 1:56 pm
In a joint filing made today, Microsoft "requests that trial be scheduled between August 5 and August 20, 2013", while Google would like it to "occur between September 23 to October 25". [read post]
10 Feb 2013, 6:59 pm
Thus the joint motion, and some related ones. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:50 am
Motorola would like to be able to, while Apple wants to close the door to new contentions.A day after the motion, i.e., on Wednesday, Judge Robert Scola, the Miami-based federal judge presiding over this lawsuit, granted this joint motion, but the irony of Motorola's push for more time wasn't lost on him, and he also made reference to the fact that the parties previously proposed completely divergent schedules:"The parties indicate that… [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:50 am
Motorola would like to be able to, while Apple wants to close the door to new contentions.A day after the motion, i.e., on Wednesday, Judge Robert Scola, the Miami-based federal judge presiding over this lawsuit, granted this joint motion, but the irony of Motorola's push for more time wasn't lost on him, and he also made reference to the fact that the parties previously proposed completely divergent schedules:"The parties… [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm
The question is currently pending in the Fifth Circuit, with oral argument scheduled for October 2nd. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 12:36 pm
Defendants must file a joint notice designating the Lead Defendant ten (10) days prior to the deadline to exchange proposed terms for construction (pursuant to P.R. 4-1). [read post]
4 Aug 2012, 6:50 am
" The judge also warned the parties that if they could not reach an agreement along the lines she had proposed, she would not rule out lifting the stay and finalizing the divorce. [read post]
13 Jun 2012, 1:26 pm
Before addressing these various questions, we provide a brief summary of the competition class action regime in Canada for background purposes. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
Specifically, the three arranged for a series of margin call payments to be made and then had the Annual Report filed during a very brief window before the next series of margin calls were made (and did not disclose the issue to auditors or in the report). [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 12:07 pm
The parents’ caveat contended that the four pieces of real property were “a continuing joint investment program between the decedent and ... his parents. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 8:38 am
The Court directed the parties to submit a joint schedule (or, the parties could not agree, separate proposed schedules) by January 27, 2012. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 7:54 am
Fourth, the judge considered the proposed trial schedules submitted by both the defense and the prosecution (Appellate Exhibit 23) and set the course of litigation to come, with another hearing in mid-April. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 5:06 pm
The merit panel will only decide motions after the panel is assigned, which occurs after briefing is completed. [read post]
3 Jan 2012, 1:44 pm
The parties are strongly urged to submit a joint proposal and are reminded that the court looks with extreme disfavor on repetitious submissions and will, where appropriate, require a joint brief of aligned parties with total words not to exceed the standard allotment for a single brief. [read post]
12 Nov 2011, 1:20 pm
As I'll discuss in a subsequent post, the defense challenged only pieces of the proposed protective order in their briefs. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
The Parties agreed that this arrangement would avoid the requirement for a very substantial amount of evidence in this proceeding regarding Cascades Inc. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am
The record established that the proposed relocation would not have a substantial impact on the visitation schedule. [read post]
16 May 2011, 12:10 pm
” Guardians and FWS said they would not oppose CBD being sllowed to comment on the agreement as amicus curiae, or friend of the court, “provided CBD is able to move for such leave in a timely manner so as to avoid any significant disruption to the current briefing schedule for the Joint Motion for Approval. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:39 pm
The parties in this case dated for five or six months and this brief time together produced a bouncing baby boy in January, 2006. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:19 am
The joint motion included an agreed-upon briefing schedule that contemplates the filing of briefs with the court between November 2010 and February 2011. [read post]
