Search for: "Jonathan S. Smith" Results 81 - 100 of 1,070
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
Deneen’s Regime Change: Toward a Postliberal Future (2023), Yoram Hazony’s Conservatism: A Rediscovery (2022), and Adrian Vermeule’s Common Good Constitutionalism: Recovering the Classical Legal Tradition (2022). [read post]
31 Aug 2023, 2:18 am by Seán Binder
Nick Corasaniti and Jonathan Weisman report for the New York Times. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 6:11 am by Neil H. Buchanan
He is right that the outcome from Smiths prosecution will be terrible. [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
But when prosecutors working for special counsel Jack Smith challenged Trump’s executive privilege claims before a judge, Meadows pivoted. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Not only did Smith not charge him with any such crime, but there was little evidence that even the most radical defendants charged were planning to overthrow the nation’s government or were part of a broader conspiracy. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by jonathanturley
Jonathan Turley, an attorney, constitutional law scholar and legal analyst, is the Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law at The George Washington University Law School. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Special Counsel Obtained Trump’s Twitter Direct Messages The Hill – Rebecca Beitsch | Published: 8/16/2023 Special counsel Jack Smith sought to review former President Trump’s direct messages, draft tweets, and location information as his office battled for information related to his account on X, formerly known as Twitter. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Smiths team repeatedly mentioned Trump’s tweets in an indictment that charges the former president with conspiring to subvert the will of voters and cling to power after he lost the 2020 election to Joe Biden. [read post]
9 Aug 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
Jonathan Turley, an attorney, constitutional law scholar and legal analyst, is the Shapiro Chair for Public Interest Law at The George Washington University Law School. [read post]
8 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
Jonathan Turley is an attorney and professor at George Washington University Law School. [read post]
7 Aug 2023, 6:00 am by jonathanturley
Jonathan Turley is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law for George Washington University. [read post]
4 Aug 2023, 3:00 am by jonathanturley
Jonathan Turley, a member of USA TODAY’s Board of Contributors, is the Shapiro Professor of Public Interest Law at George Washington University. [read post]
2 Aug 2023, 5:34 am
It says in "Four takeaways from Trump's indictment for 2020 election interference" (BBC).That points me to Jonathan Turley's tweets, which I'm reading here:Special Counsel Jack Smith just issued the first criminal indictment of alleged disinformation in my view. [read post]
30 Jul 2023, 11:24 am by Ryan Goodman
” Trump’s plan to declare victory on election night, even if he lost On November 1, 2020 and on January 16, 2021, journalist Jonathan Swan reported that “for weeks, Trump had been laying the groundwork to declare victory on election night — even if he lost. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 9:01 am by Alexis Boaz
Manufacturer’s Decision to Continue Manufacturer to pursue national coverage under the TCET pathway and submit:A formal NCD letter expressing the manufacturer’s desire for CMS to open a TCET NCD analysisAdditional materials the manufacturer believes support the TCET NCD request OR Manufacturer to discontinue the TCET pathway F. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
It is Adam Smiths “invisible hand” at work, but on a political level. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 7:00 am by jonathanturley
Supreme Court, which rebuked Smith for what it termed the “Government’s boundless interpretation. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 9:16 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Representative Jason Smith (R-Mo.), stated that the rule would remove “the coverage many Americans have and can afford today. [read post]