Search for: "Jones v Lopez" Results 81 - 100 of 113
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am by Maureen Johnston
Latsis thirty-percent rule—that, ordinarily, a qualifying “seaman” under the Jones Act must spend thirty percent or more of his time in service of a vessel in navigation—a court may consider the time a [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 11:44 am by Howard Wasserman
You can do this with independent documents or by using a case companion ("A Civil Action" or one tied to Jones v. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Josh Blackman
Virtually every book included Lopez; several omitted Morrison and Raich. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 6:41 am by Ruthann Robson - Guest
Lopez),  the Necessary and Proper Clause (United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm by INFORRM
The producers of Hustlers are asking a New York federal judge to toss a lawsuit filed by the real-life adult entertainer who inspired Jennifer Lopez’s character in the film, arguing she can’t succeed on her claims that the film used her likeness without permission and damaged her reputation. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:08 am by John Elwood
Riley, 14-1472, and Jones v. [read post]
9 May 2018, 9:40 am by John Elwood
If that seems as familiar as Indiana Jones 4, that very question is already before the court in a number of serial relists: Allen v. [read post]
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am by admin
Nonetheless, Judge Jones, in his published decision, clearly rejected all the plaintiffs’ witnesses and affiants, including Egilman, in their efforts to make a case for silicone as a cause of autoimmune disease. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
IPSO 10382-22 Mitchell v The Sentinel, 1 Accuracy (2021), Breach – sanction: action as offered by publication Satisfactory Remedy – 10512-22 Bavister v cornwalllive.com, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – satisfactory remedy 01732-22 Rahman v Mail Online, 1 Accuracy (2021), 2 Privacy (2021), 3 Harassment (2021), 12 Discrimination (2021), No breach – after investigation 00627-22 Doe v You (The Mail on Sunday), 2 Privacy (2021), No breach –… [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 5:26 am by Eugene Volokh
Crain (5th Cir. 2010) (revised as to other matters the following year); Jones v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 7:07 am by Marty Lederman
Over at the Volokh Conspiracy, my colleague Randy Barnett, who's representing the private plaintiffs in the ACA case, has written a post focusing upon Justice Kennedy's expressed concern that in order for the Court to uphold section 5000A of the ACA, it might have to issue what Randy calls an "unbounded" opinion, one that would permit Congress to require the purchase of virtually any product--an outcome that Justice Kennedy fears would “change the relationship of the… [read post]