Search for: "Jones v. Long"
Results 81 - 100
of 2,350
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2012, 11:01 am
Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) had just one reaction to the colorful testimony Wednesday on Capitol Hill from Jones Day partner Michael Carvin: "We should probably give you the award for saying the highest level of sarcasm we've heard before this committee in a long time. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 3:57 pm
This is a long shot, to be sure, but it’s not a frivolous argument. [read post]
8 May 2012, 10:19 am
Jones v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 10:58 am
Jones. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 6:04 am
Case citation: Jones v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 5:40 pm
Dale Oesterle comments:The Supreme Court has agreed to take a case on executive pay, Jones v Harris Associates. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 9:45 pm
Carroll v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 11:50 pm
See United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 1:22 pm
Jones (formerly known as United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 10:29 am
Case citation: Jones v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 1:12 pm
A Louisiana Appellate Court has reaffirmed this standard in Bancroft v. [read post]
25 May 2010, 1:12 pm
A Louisiana Appellate Court has reaffirmed this standard in Bancroft v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:02 am
Related Posts: Jamie Leigh Jones v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:02 am
Related Posts: Jamie Leigh Jones v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 11:38 pm
What makes Jones v. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 11:38 pm
What makes Jones v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 7:25 am
Transocean Offshore USA, Inc., et al., No. 05-300963, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed its long standing decision that a watercraft under construction is not a “vessel in navigation” for purposes of the Jones Act. [read post]
11 Dec 2014, 4:13 pm
Jones, Ph.D., and Timothy Stoltzfus Jost, J.D. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 2:40 pm
Maersk moved for a judgment as a matter of law, alleging that Skye’s injuries were not cognizable under the Jones Act based on Consolidated Rail Corp. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 6:20 am
Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. v. [read post]
