Search for: "Jones v. Office of the State Public Defenders"
Results 81 - 100
of 738
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2022, 7:36 am
The vast majority of people that go through the state criminal court system — as many as 90% — are represented by public defenders, many of whom are under-resourced and overburdened. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:50 am
Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 8:32 am
Quarles: Confession obtained without Miranda Rights warning admissible when public safety concerns prompted police questioning. 1989 Pennsylvania v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 10:48 am
In Dahlia v. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 9:15 am
Jones v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 8:30 am
Jones (1984), to determine whether a defendant's contacts are sufficient to make the exercise of jurisdiction fair, just, and reasonable. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 4:51 pm
The Tyson defendants removed invoking the federal officer statute because, among other factors, they claimed they were “acting under” the direction of a federal officer when they remained open throughout the pandemic to avoid a nationwide food shortage. [read post]
28 Jun 2022, 5:58 am
United States, 585 U.S. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
Therefore, he rightly criticizes scholars who defend the Court’s creative progressive decisionmaking by claiming that the Justices are objectively discerning the public values of morality embodied in the Constitution's text.[29]Indeed, liberals’ moral “constitutional” values – such as countenancing abortion and same-sex marriage – clash with those of conservatives (especially traditional Christians). [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 5:00 pm
” In a nutshell, their advocates at the New York Times, Atlantic, Washington Post, CNN, Mother Jones, etc., argue that socialism and a welfare state is incompatible with self defense rights. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:03 am
On appeal, defendants argued that the plaintiff’s description of its trade secrets was inadequate because it did not state which secrets it claimed that the defendant had misappropriated. [read post]
31 May 2022, 5:57 am
On May 18, 2022, the Fifth Circuit held in Jarkesy v. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
It held that there had been no valid service on the defendant because the address used was not the defendant’s representative in the UK, it was merely an office in London from which the defendant did not carry out business. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
The lower the schedule, the greater the risk to the public. [read post]
24 Mar 2022, 2:32 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 12:34 pm
See United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 5:03 am
"); Jones v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 3:35 pm
His claim against the second defendant failed – and it was this that he appealed against on public interest grounds. [read post]
23 Jan 2022, 2:03 pm
The plaintiff prepared a written agreement and stated it contained these provisions, which defendants signed without reading it. [read post]
