Search for: "Josh Chafetz"
Results 81 - 100
of 140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2011, 12:18 pm
In conjunction with the exhibit, the Law Library and Elizabethan Club are sponsoring a public lecture by Professor Josh Chafetz (Law '07) of Cornell Law School, entitled "'In the Time of a Woman, Which Sex Was Not Capable of Mature Deliberation': Late-Tudor Parliamentary Relations and Their Early-Stuart Discontents. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 2:23 am
They look at Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution â€â [read post]
9 Jan 2024, 4:06 am
I previously criticized Georgetown Law Professor Josh Chafetz who supported more “aggressive” protests targeting justices “when the mob is right. [read post]
14 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Helen Norton, The Government's Speech and the Constitution (Cambridge University Press, 2019).Josh ChafetzHelen Norton’s The Government’s Speech and the Constitution is a marvelous book. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 8:39 am
At the New Books Network, Josh Chafetz is interviewed about his Congress's Constitution Legislative Authority and the Separation of Powers. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 10:56 am
Georgetown Law Professor Josh Chafetz and others are interested in taking a more active approach to making continuation on the Court as unpleasant as possible — at least for conservatives. [read post]
10 Mar 2020, 9:03 pm
To be sure, as Josh Chafetz helpfully points out, congressional capacity has declined precipitously in recent decades. [read post]
28 Jun 2024, 10:51 am
This discussion implicates the concept of “judicial aggrandizement,” that, with Josh Chafetz of Georgetown Law, we have explored in our recent and ongoing research. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:29 am
To discuss these and many other issues, we have invited an exciting group of constitutional scholars: Josh Chafetz Joseph R. [read post]
“He Cares about People”: Sotomayor Praises Thomas As Professors and Pundits Pile on Personal Attacks
21 Oct 2022, 7:37 am
As protesters descended on the homes of justices, Georgetown Law Professor Josh Chafetz declared that “when the mob is right, some (but not all!) [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:31 pm
Ali, University of Hong Kong - Faculty of Law Constitutionalism, Legal Pluralism, and International Regimes Alec Stone Sweet, Yale Law School and Yale Political Science Law & Humanities e-Journal Legal Holes Noa Ben-Asher, Pace University - School of Law The Radicalism of Legal Positivism Brian Leiter, University of Chicago Law School Democracy and Antigone Ruthann Robson, City University of New York - CUNY School of Law Impeachment and Assassination Josh Chafetz,… [read post]
30 Sep 2023, 10:49 am
Josh Chafetz will be on hand to heartily disagree. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 4:13 am
Recently, I criticized fellow Georgetown Law Professor Josh Chafetz who supported more “aggressive” protests targeting justices “when the mob is right. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 9:01 pm
The court acknowledged that it has in fact resolved such disputes, including one involving a Senate subpoena to President Nixon during Watergate, but then, quoting my colleague Josh Chafetz, decided to disregard those precedents on the ground that “courts have never offered a persuasive reason why a congressional subpoena to an executive branch official” gives rise to a proper case.That is a truly stunning move. [read post]
2 Feb 2024, 5:00 am
” Georgetown Law Professor Josh Chafetz and others are interested in taking a more active approach to making continuation on the Court as unpleasant as possible — at least for conservatives. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 5:24 am
Georgetown Law Professor Josh Chafetz declared that “when the mob is right, some (but not all!) [read post]
The problematics of impeachment (I): The specific problems of Charles Black's take on the presidency
29 Jan 2020, 12:52 pm
The implicit reason, of course, is that it would be the equivalent of parricide (and not simply, as Josh Chafetz suggested some years ago in an excellent article, a useful substitute for tyrannicide). [read post]
29 Jan 2020, 8:52 pm
Is the desire to be even stricter simply another sign of the pathological way we treat our presidents as father figures and our strange incorporation of Josh Chafetz's insight that since impeachment=tyrannicide, and therefore paracide, it should become almost literally unthinkable? [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 12:11 am
What I do believe is that the Senate may have more options in this case than one might think.UPDATE: Akhil Amar and Josh Chafetz over at Slate reach conclusions similar to mine by a different route: They point out (as does Mark Tushnet) that the Senate is also the judge of the "return" which, in this case, means the report of an appointment. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 12:56 am
At Cornell's Constitutional Law & Theory Colloquium (which I run with my colleague Josh Chafetz), Gerhardt discussed the overview chapter and the chapter on William Henry Harrison. [read post]
