Search for: "Judicial Review Council" Results 81 - 100 of 4,398
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
District Court the the first level review of an ALJ's decision is a poor use of scarce federal judicial resources. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 7:43 pm by Shea Denning
Of the 432 complaints that the Commission considered last year, 283 were dismissed after initial review. [read post]
2 Jul 2009, 6:07 am
The Judicial Council of the U.S. [read post]
28 May 2008, 12:35 pm
The application for judicial review on grounds of failure to make a timely decision on interim accommodation was made on 10 April 2008, after a review request on 4 April 2008. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 3:06 am
Janik (Univ. of Vienna - Law) has posted Judicial Dialogue on the 1267 Smart Sanctions Regime (Austrian Review of International and European Law, forthcoming). [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Luciano Bottini Filho
Insights from a Scoping Review on Constitutional Rights for the WHO Council on the Economics of Health for All appeared first on Bill of Health. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 5:00 am by Elena Chachko
Moreover, judicial review seems to have encouraged the council to adhere to more robust procedures before sanctions are imposed. [read post]
4 Sep 2008, 8:41 pm
Council and Commission (that we had noted here) but also annuls the EC measures because the right to be heard, the right to effective judicial review and the right to property were infringed by the Council and the Commission when they implemented the UN Security Council resolutions. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 8:29 am by David Hart QC
Newport City Council, Court of Appeal, 29 March 2012, read judgment  Two first-instance cases last year (Buglife, and Broads) considered whether a defendant to a judicial review involving a European point can complain that the proceedings were not commenced “promptly” even though they were commenced within the 3 month time limit. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:05 pm by Eileen McDermott
Today’s decision denied Newman’s petition for review of the Council’s decision, holding that the Council did not abuse its discretion in refusing to transfer the proceedings to a different circuit, that Newman has not shown good cause for her failure to cooperate, and that the sanction did not exceed the Judicial Council’s authority. [read post]
7 Feb 2024, 1:05 pm by Eileen McDermott
Today’s decision denied Newman’s petition for review of the Council’s decision, holding that the Council did not abuse its discretion in refusing to transfer the proceedings to a different circuit, that Newman has not shown good cause for her failure to cooperate, and that the sanction did not exceed the Judicial Council’s authority. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 11:02 am by Kenneth Anderson
Objections can also come from an awareness that these matters cannot be de-politicized and judicialized. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:57 am by James Hamilton
According to the Council, the panel’s decision reflects a failure to abide by the standards applicable to judicial review of agency determinations and, in particular, agency cost-benefit analysis. [read post]