Search for: "Juice Generation Inc."
Results 81 - 100
of 248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2016, 12:00 am
In a recent decision from the Federal Circuit in AngioScore, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 7:51 pm
In 1998 in what was the first criminal conviction in a large-scale food-poisoning outbreak, Odwalla Inc. pleaded guilty to violating Federal food safety laws and agreed to pay a $1.5 million fine for selling tainted apple juice that killed a 16-month-old girl and sickened 70 other people in several states in 1996. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 4:12 am
" In re Melville Corp., 18 USPQ2d 1386, 1388 (TTAB 1991)(internal citations omitted); see also Juice Generation, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:29 am
Mills, Inc. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 11:27 am
” In addition, Harpo, Inc., the producers of “The Oprah Winfrey Show,” and Dr. [read post]
2 May 2018, 1:30 am
Inc. v. [read post]
14 Sep 2018, 2:38 pm
Tuxedo Monopoly, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 11:41 am
General Mills, Inc., 2007 WL 4762172 (C.D. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
La Cafetière, Inc (Property intangible) TTAB affirms 2(e)(1) mere descriptiveness refusal of ROUGE TOMATE for fruit and vegetable juices (TTABlog) TTAB finds THE FITNESS SNEAKER generic for… guess what? [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 5:53 pm
More than five years ago, Durand-Wayland, Inc. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 1:01 pm
Tomapple for tomato-apple juice); and (4) generic (i.e. restaurant for a restaurant). [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 2:49 am
Omaha Steaks International, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:51 pm
Nestlé USA, Inc., 2013 WL 4083218 (N.D. [read post]
28 Jun 2023, 4:17 am
Spireon, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 3:48 am
Cir. 2015) (citing Juice Generation, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Apr 2013, 3:30 am
Fla. 2008) (holding that no privilege applies where an insurer retains an attorney to assist in developing the investigation, securing examinations under oath, propounding prelitigation document requests and the like); Cutrale Citrus Juices USA, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 3:18 am
"The Board noted that in Jack Wolfskin there were at least 14 relevant third-party uses and registrations, and in Juice Generation there were 26.The Board recognized that there is a "certain degree of weakness in the cited mark, but even weak marks are entitled to protection against similar marks for identical goods and/or services.And so the Board found confusion likely and it affirmed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: What do you… [read post]
14 Apr 2017, 4:54 am
"And so the Board reversed the refusal.Read comments and post your comment here.TTABlog comment: This is one of the infrequent, post-Juice Generation TTAB decisions in which the number of third-party uses (3) and registrations (9) were sufficient to affect the Section 2(d) outcome, even without proof of the manner and extent of use of the third-party marks. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 2:53 am
" Brooks Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 9:05 pm
” Odwalla: In 1998 in what was the first criminal conviction in a large-scale food-poisoning outbreak, Odwalla Inc. pleaded guilty to violating Federal food safety laws and agreed to pay a $1.5 million fine for selling tainted apple juice that killed a 16-month-old girl and sickened 70 other people in several states in 1996. [read post]
