Search for: "Julian Sanchez"
Results 81 - 100
of 228
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2014, 8:36 am
And Julian Sanchez’s essay Snowden: Year One raises a number of these issues, including whether the surveillance is too broad, with too few limits and too little oversight. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 7:24 am
” The lead essay, by Cato’s Julian Sanchez, opens as follows: America’s first real debate about the 21st century surveillance state began one year ago. [read post]
7 Jun 2014, 10:55 am
” Arguing in favor were Jameel Jaffer of the ACLU and Julian Sanchez of the CATO Institute. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 10:45 am
” Arguing in favor are Jameel Jaffer of the ACLU and Julian Sanchez of the CATO Institute. [read post]
1 Jun 2014, 9:00 pm
” Arguing in favor are Jameel Jaffer of the ACLU and Julian Sanchez of the CATO Institute. [read post]
28 May 2014, 12:10 pm
” Arguing in favor are Jameel Jaffer of the ACLU and Julian Sanchez of the CATO Institute. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:00 am
Session 7: The Prospects for Reform Moderator: Bobby Chesney (UT) Participants: Carrie Cordero (Georgetown), Julian Sanchez (Cato) The conference concluded with a slightly-longer session regarding the path forward. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm
Bill Bradley, Julian Bond in previous books, Rep. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 4:00 pm
Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel), Jennifer Daskal (American University) 3:45-4:00 Break 4:00-5:00 Session 5: The Content Collection Controversy Moderator: Bobby Chesney (UT) Participants: Timothy Edgar (Brown University), Jennifer Granick (Stanford University) 7:00-9:00 Dinner, Featuring a Conversation with NSA General Counsel… [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 8:47 am
For critics of the program, including Harley Geiger of the Center for Democracy and Technology, and the Cato Institute’s Jim Harper and Julian Sanchez, current checks on the program don’t work (see Sanchez’s critique of the FISC here) and secrecy compounds the problem. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 7:42 am
The problem with this was well summed up by Cato's Julian Sanchez: Terror attacks are (thankfully) so rare and varied that any system with the slightest chance of detecting a real one would necessarily yield a vast, paralyzing number of false positives. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 4:14 pm
Olson announced today that Julian Vega-Valdez, 25, a Mexican national, was sentenced today in federal court in Pocatello to 70 months in prison for distributing five grams or more of actual methamphetamine. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 10:56 am
Litt General Counsel, Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Washington, DC Panel II Edward Black (Testimony) President & CEO, Computer & Communications Industry Association, Washington, DC Julian Sanchez (Testimony) Research Fellow, Cato Institute, Washington, DC Carrie F. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 2:49 pm
As Cato Fellow Julian Sanchez points out, there is a lengthy and disturbing history of abuse. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 9:45 am
Cato Institute researcher and Ars alum Julian Sanchez recently pulled a few sentences from a 2009 declaration by NSA Director Keith Alexander. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 8:26 pm
As Julian Sanchez put it so eloquently, "Good defensive patents are bad patents." [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 3:49 am
Just Security‘s masthead includes, in addition to Steve and Ryan: Philip Alston, David Cole, Jen Daskal, Mary DeRosa, Daphne Eviatar, Shaheed Fatima, Jennifer Granick, Jameel Jaffer, Derek Jinks, Sarah Knuckey, Harold Hongju Koh, Marty Lederman, David Luban, Fionnuala Ní Aoláin, Julian Sanchez, Meg Satterthwaite, Steve Schulhofer, Hina Shamsi, Beth Van Schaack, Jeremy… [read post]
30 Aug 2013, 6:24 am
Virginia – Lax Laws Lead to Cloudy View of Lobbyists’ Spending The Virginian-Pilot – Julian Walker | Published: 8/29/2013 Lobbyists reported spending $15.9 million in Virginia from May 2012 to April 2013. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 2:34 pm
In a separate case, Josue Rodriguez-Sanchez, 25, and Julian Vega-Valdez, 25, both of Idaho Falls, pleaded guilty on Wednesday. [read post]
10 Aug 2013, 8:45 am
Julian Sanchez of the Cato Institute has a good post discussing some of the other risks of this kind of “mission creep”: This should serve as a crucial reminder that you can’t build a massive architecture of surveillance “just for terrorism” and expect it to remain limited to that function: once the apparatus exists, there will inevitably be incredible pressure from other interests within government to expand its use. [read post]
